article thumbnail

No cause of action against employers for take-home COVID

At the Lectern

Responding to questions asked by the Ninth Circuit about California law, the court’s unanimous opinion by Justice Carol Corrigan precludes an action alleging a construction worker’s wife contracted COVID from her husband due to his employer’s failure to abide by government health orders at the beginning of the pandemic.

article thumbnail

Insurance statute did not create private right of action for general contractor

Day on Torts

The Tennessee Supreme Court recently explained the analysis for whether a statute creates a private right of action. In Affordable Construction Services, Inc. Plaintiff general contractor brought this action in chancery court, asserting that it had a private right of action pursuant to a Tennessee statute.

Statute 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Sides With Death Row Inmate in DNA-Testing Case

Constitutional Law Reporter

According to the Court majority, when a prisoner pursues state post-conviction DNA testing through the state-provided litigation process, the statute of limitations for a 42 U.S.C. The Court next turned to the key issue — when the clock on the two-year statute of limitations began to run. The District Court dismissed Reed’s complaint.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court gives some anti-SLAPP protection to hospital peer review proceedings

At the Lectern

Joseph Health System , the Supreme Court today holds that the anti-SLAPP statute , which allows for an early screening of claims that could chill constitutionally protected free speech or petition rights, can be used to review some, but not all, causes of action relating to mandatory hospital medical staff peer review proceedings.

Statute 49
article thumbnail

Finding of conversion and fraudulent concealment affirmed where brother signed sister’s name on check

Day on Torts

Further, the trial court found that plaintiff had satisfied the elements of fraudulent concealment such that the three-year statute of limitations was tolled and the case was not time-barred. The Court next analyzed defendant’s claim that the conversion case was barred by the statute of limitations. In Pomeroy v. McGinnis , No.

Divorce 59
article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Renders Personal Jurisdiction Decision

Conflict of Laws

Supreme Court yesterday upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s corporate registration statute, even though it requires out-of-state corporations registering to do business within the state to consent to all-purpose (general) personal jurisdiction. This post is by Maggie Gardner, a professor of law at Cornell Law School.

Court 40
article thumbnail

Supreme Court will hear election law case with standing issue

At the Lectern

Ari Design & Construction, Inc. , It also held, however, that the defendant-contractor’s surety was responsible for paying the award even though it exceeded the amount of the surety’s construction bond. See here and here.). The court denied review in Karton v. but Justice Carol Corrigan recorded a vote to grant.

Court 49