article thumbnail

Using Motions to Get a Lawsuit Dismissed Early in California

Chugh LLP

In California, a motion for sanctions may be one of the most successful methods for dismissal. The responsive pleading can be in the form of an answer, a demurrer, or a motion. Complaints are rarely dismissed based on demurrers in California. Complaints are rarely dismissed based on demurrers in California.

article thumbnail

A very, very bad oral argument strategy

At the Lectern

” Many years after his journalism career, the article relates, Pickett moved to California, and, “In the mid-1870s, he started a fight during a trial before the California Supreme Court by seizing one of the justices and dragging him off his seat on the bench.” Hastings (1874) 47 Cal. 269, 271.). ” (57 Cal.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

A double conference with no straight grants, but some significant denials

At the Lectern

The dissent specifically urged the Supreme Court to grant review on its own motion (see rule 8.512 (c)(1)), as did the California District Attorneys Association, but the court declined. State of California (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th ” (Emphasis added.) ” (Emphasis added.) ” (Emphases added.) ” ( Id.

article thumbnail

A second no-straight-grants conference

At the Lectern

In Shusha , the Second District, Division Seven, Court of Appeal published opinion held a restaurant’s “allegations that contamination by the COVID-19 virus physically altered its restaurant premises were sufficient to withstand demurrer.” ” COVID insurance transfer denial. In San Jose Sharks v.

article thumbnail

Review granted in a taxpayer action about COVID speedy trial rights and in yet another SB 1437 case

At the Lectern

” The trial court had dismissed the action on demurrer, ruling that one superior court cannot direct a writ of mandamus to another superior court. Regents of University of California , pending on review , the court ordered supplemental briefs “addressing the significance, if any, of Assembly Bill No. 1307 (2023-2024 Reg.

article thumbnail

Boohoo Group Says it Has Reached a Preliminary Settlement in Case Over “Fraudulent” Reference Pricing

The Fashion Law

District Court [for the Central District of California] that they have agreed to the terms of a preliminary settlement relating to the [plaintiffs’] claims,” a representative for Manchester, UK-based Boohoo Group revealed on Thursday. Boohoo is pleased to report that the parties have notified the [U.S.] The Defendants’ Answers.

Statute 64
article thumbnail

Review granted in wages case

At the Lectern

and more fully explain why that departure is appropriate under current California law.” In Rattagan , the court is expected to answer the Ninth Circuit’s question , “Under California law, are claims for fraudulent concealment exempted from the economic loss rule?” Uber Technologies, Inc. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co.