SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 18, 2021
In an argument calendar released on Wednesday, the Supreme Court announced that it will hear oral arguments in eight cases over five days, on topics that include Sen. The post Justices set January argument calendar appeared first on SCOTUSblog. Gonzalez (Jan. 11): Whether a non-citizen who is detained under 8 U.S.C. Boechler v.
At the Lectern
AUGUST 12, 2022
These will be the first of eight opinions for cases argued on the June calendar. But, there are still three opinions outstanding for late-May calendar cases. presents issues relating to petitions for Special Immigrant Findings under Code of Civil Procedure section 155. (Briefs here ; oral argument videos here and here.).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 7, 2022
After a few slow weeks on the relist front, the Supreme Court came roaring back this week with four newly relisted petitions that, if granted, will likely be added to the March 2023 argument calendar. Helaman Hansen ran an immigration-advising service. Two years ago, in United States v. Our first new relist this week, United States v.
At the Lectern
MAY 18, 2022
The Supreme Court today announced it will hear eight cases on it June calendar. Some Courts of Appeal are returning to in-person arguments, but the Supreme Court’s June calendar, like all of its calendars since April 2020 , will be remote and based in San Francisco. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1); b)(1); see People v.
Attorney at Work
MAY 31, 2022
The statute of limitations ran out due to his forgetting the deadline. A Chicago immigration lawyer moved for an emergency stay of removal for a client after an asylum application was denied. The Tennessee lawyer failed to add a calendar reminder to track the statute of limitations deadline.
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 17, 2023
Raimondo headline the calendar for the January argument session , which the court released on Friday morning. Natural Resources Defense Council , in which the court held that when a federal statute is ambiguous, courts should defer to an agency’s interpretation of that law as long as it is reasonable. Relentless, Inc. Singh , Jan.
JURIST
FEBRUARY 5, 2021
The US Supreme Court released an order on Wednesday granting the Biden administration’s request to remove oral arguments for challenges on now-defunct Trump administration immigration policies. Sierra Club , are both likely to be rendered moot because of President Joe Biden’s announced changes to immigration policy.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
99 
Let's personalize your content