SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 25, 2022

Share The Supreme Court is poised to decide yet another case involving one of the many federal statutes that govern the nation’s railroads and railworkers. The court will hear argument on Monday in LeDure v. Union Pacific Railroad Company , a case about the scope of the Locomotive Inspection Act.

Statute 101

Statute Court Government Criminal Law 101

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 24, 2021

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The last scheduled conference of the Supreme Court’s term — which this term is being held Thursday — is usually one that yields many grants. A short explanation of relists is available here.

Administrative Law 69

Administrative Law Immigration Laws Government 69

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 10, 2024

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. At last week’s conference, the Supreme Court had 472 petitions and applications before it – including three new relists, which yielded (so far) zero grants. Court of Appeals for the D.C.

Court 108

Court Laws Government Immigration 108

The Crime Report

NOVEMBER 21, 2022

from a duplex in the heart of Decatur, Illinois. In the coming weeks, ProPublica will reveal the origins of 911 call analysis and the local, state and federal agencies that foster it, despite a consensus among experts that its application is scientifically baseless. “I can’t,” Logan replied, inhaling sharply to force the words out.

Lawyer 111

Lawyer Lawyers Court Attorney 111

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. She said she disguised 911 call analysis in court by “getting creative … without calling it ‘science.’”. “I Searches for 911 call analysis in national court dockets come up virtually empty too.

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 15, 2023

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. Since our last installment , the Supreme Court has continued slowly chipping away at the still-sizable number of lingering relists from the end-of-summer “long conference.” United States.

Healthcare 112

Healthcare Contract Court Government 112

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 1, 2021

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. Two relists involve free exercise cases that the court held while it was reviewing Fulton v. City of Philadelphia , which the court decided on June 17. When the court requests the views of the U.S.

Compensatory Damages 86

Compensatory Damages Government Court Cause of Action 86

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 30, 2020

Public agencies are doing their part by closing offices to the public, canceling or postponing hearings, and shifting services and proceedings to virtual formats. Illinois has suspended the legal requirement that members of a public body must be physically present to assemble, as well as restrictions on remote participation.

Laws 52

Laws Government Statute Technology 52

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

Federal Court Denied Oakland and San Francisco Motions to Return Climate Change Nuisance Cases to State Court; Found Federal Common Law of Nuisance Could Apply, Despite AEP v. The court dispensed with the cities’ three primary arguments for remanding the cases. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 107.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

LawSites

DECEMBER 4, 2023

Finally, we will directly target clients (enterprises and government agencies) with the idea that our track record would help become their preferred partners. We securely give fiduciaries access to assets when required with no password-sharing, no court orders, and correct titling. It also allows us to work internationally.

Document Review 126

Document Review Court Reporting Metadata Court Reporter 126

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MAY 7, 2021

Supreme Court seeking review of the D.C. The states argued that the Supreme Court’s stay of the Clean Power Plan while it was under review by the D.C. The states argued that the Supreme Court’s stay of the Clean Power Plan while it was under review by the D.C. FEATURED CASE. The company argued that the D.C.

Court 40

Court Government Construction Litigation 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

Louisiana Federal Court Blocked Biden Administration “Pause” on New Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the Western District of Louisiana issued a nationwide preliminary injunction barring the Biden administration from implementing a “Pause” on new oil and natural gas leases on public lands or in offshore waters.

Court 44

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 44

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 25, 2022

Share On Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Biden v. immigration court. In March 2020, the court allowed the Trump administration to begin enforcing the policy after a federal district judge in California blocked it. In October 2020, the Supreme Court agreed to review a ruling by the U.S.

Immigration 99

Immigration Court Government Laws 99

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 7, 2021

As a compromise, the commission was formed and consisted of 15 members : five Supreme Court justices and five members from each chamber of Congress. However, in a move that seemed calculated to secure his vote for Tilden, the Illinois legislature then moved to appoint the independent, Justice David Davis , to the Senate.

Laws 55

Laws Government Court Constitutional Law 55

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 22, 2022

Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. immigration court. immigration court.

Immigration 98

Immigration Legal Legal Government 98

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v.

Immigration 93

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 93