article thumbnail

August 2022 Update: List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments

Conflict of Laws

On 21 August 2022, China Justice Observer released the 2022 version of the List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments. The full version of the 2022 List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments is available here. Written by Dr. Meng Yu and Dr. Guodong Du, co-founders of China Justice Observer*.

article thumbnail

August 2023 Update: List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments

Conflict of Laws

The 2020 update and 2022 update were also posted on Conflictoflaws.net. Please note that in In re DAR (2022) Jing 01 Po Shen No. The first of its kind was the Spar Shipping case reported in 2022, in which an English monetary judgment was recognized in China for the first time. Another noteworthy case is S D Biotechnologies Co.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

GTLA Attorney’s Fees Provision Permitting Award Against Plaintiff Deemed Constitutional

Day on Torts

A provision of the GTLA allowing for the recovery of attorney’s fees by a governmental employee who was the prevailing party in a GTLA suit was constitutional and did not deprive plaintiff of her right to access the courts. M2020-01509-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 1040371 (Tenn. In Taylor v. Miriam’s Promise , No. internal citations omitted).

Statute 59
article thumbnail

New York sues New Jersey over compact governing Port of New York and New Jersey

SCOTUSBlog

To the 3rd Circuit, the compact did not amount to federal law such that the doctrine of Ex parte Young , which allows federal courts to enjoin state officials from taking actions that allegedly violate federal law, did not apply. The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor v. O’Donnell & Sons, Inc.

article thumbnail

Application of Singapore’s new rules on service out of jurisdiction: Three Arrows Capital and NW Corp

Conflict of Laws

Application of Singapore’s new rules on service out of jurisdiction: Three Arrows Capital and NW Corp The Rules of Court 2021 (‘ROC 2021’) entered into force on 1 April 2022. 5] Li Shengwu v Attorney-General [2019] 1 SLR 1081 (CA). 8] CLM v CLN [2022] 5 SLR 273; Bybit Fintech Ltd v Ho Kai Xin [2023] 5 SLR 1748. [9]

Court 67
article thumbnail

Small Tech Company Takes On Major Law Firm Over Ownership of Bill-Drafting Software

LawSites

Attorneys at Akin Gump declined to discuss the lawsuit. According to Akin Gump’s October 2022 lawsuit, Agnello claims he had “an idea that would forever change the complex process of drafting federal legislation” and lead to a “K Street Parade” among lobbying firms. Akin Gump is being represented by its attorneys Anthony T.

article thumbnail

How does the USPTO Decide the Discretionary Aspect of Institution?

Patently O

US Inventor’s attorney Robert Greenspoon decided to play-it-safe to make sure he preserved his right to appeal by filing a notice of appeal in both courts. At the same time, the actual cause of action does not stem from the patent laws but rather from the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Where to Appeal?: 251 (2013).

Statute 79