JURIST
MAY 17, 2021
In 2019, the jury found that the manufacturer was negligent, and the design on Roundup lacked sufficient cancer warnings. The jury awarded Hardeman $75 million in punitive damages, but the federal judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $20 million.
LexForti
APRIL 7, 2024
Trial Court restrained the Defendant form using the mark MEDILICE post long drawn trial and awarded punitive damages of sum of Rs. Chetana Pharma, 2007 (34) PTC 267 (Cal) (SJ), Para 11 Mere manufacturing license does not prove usage. Compensation: The Plaintiff is also entitled to punitive damages amounting to Rs.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Conflict of Laws
OCTOBER 2, 2022
On 30 September 2022, a US District Court in Boston (Massachusetts, USA) dismissed the case filed by Mexico against the US weapons manufacturers regarding non-contractual obligations (among them, negligence and unjust enrichment). BARRETT FIREARMS MANUFACTURING, INC.; COLT’S MANUFACTURING COMPANY LLC; GLOCK, INC.; BERETTA U.S.A.
The Crime Report
AUGUST 5, 2021
Along with Interstate, the defendants named are Springfield, Massachusetts-headquartered Smith & Wesson; Barrett Firearms; Beretta USA; Colt’s Manufacturing; Glock Inc.; arguing that the gunmakers’ activities violated Connecticut and Massachusetts consumer protection laws. and more than a half dozen other U.S.
Foley Hoag LLP
MARCH 11, 2022
law that are exclusive to the Xinjiang region of China by requiring such audits of any business, defined as an issuer by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, that: (1) has annual, worldwide gross receipts exceeding $500 million; and (2) is involved in the mining, production, or manufacture of goods for sale.
Broadcast Law Blog
OCTOBER 25, 2016
In 1984, the manufacturer of GATORADE ® beverages decided to use the slogan “Gatorade is Thirst Aid.” million in damages (which was reduced to $678,302 on appeal) and $16.8 million in punitive damages (which was reduced to approximately $4.1 In any event, a jury awarded Big O $2.8 million on appeal).
The Fashion Law
JUNE 29, 2021
The sportswear giant alleged that the footwear “distributed, offered for sale, and sold by Puma is not manufactured by adidas, nor is Puma associated, affiliated, or connected with adidas, or licensed, authorized, sponsored, endorsed, or approved by adidas in any way.”. Adidas moved to voluntarily dismiss the case 11 days after it was filed.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
209 
Let's personalize your content