The Crime Report

APRIL 26, 2022

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments today in the Biden administration’s appeal of lower-court rulings that required immigration officials to reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” policy that the administration “has twice determined is not in the interests of the United States,” reports the Associated Press. at the southern border.

Court Decisions 52

Court Decisions Immigration Court Court Rules 52

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 29, 2023

Louis, Missouri , 22-193 Issue : Whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination as to all “terms, conditions, or privileges of employment,” or whether its reach is limited to discriminatory employer conduct that courts determine causes materially significant disadvantages for employees. New Relists Muldrow v.

Immigration 74

Immigration Court Government Laws 74

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 10, 2024

Missouri Department of Corrections v. Finney involves an employment-discrimination suit brought by a lesbian corrections officer against the Missouri Department of Corrections. 5 conference) Missouri Dept. Washington , 23-191 Issue : Whether exhaustion of state administrative remedies is required to bring claims under 42 U.S.C.

Court 102

Court Laws Government Immigration 102

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 31, 2022

Missouri , involves a federal rule requiring all health care workers at facilities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 unless they are eligible for a medical or religious exemption. The first, Biden v. 1252(f)(1), the courts below had jurisdiction to grant classwide injunctive relief.”.

Immigration 52

Immigration Statute Tort Healthcare 52

The Crime Report

AUGUST 18, 2022

People in the 5,000 some local jails, juvenile facilities, immigration detention facilities, military prisons, and other facilities are even less likely to have access to higher education. States like Colorado , Louisiana , and Missouri specifically prioritize those who have less than five years on their sentences.

Education 111

Education Government Immigration Drafting 111

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2022

Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court justices may finally have to decide if the White House can write immigration rules (Joan Biskupic, CNN). Missouri man put to death for killing police officer in 2005 (Jim Salter, The Associated Press). To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.

Immigration 85

Immigration Court 85

JURIST

DECEMBER 2, 2021

It required that certain noncitizens entering the US from Mexico either illegally or without proper documentation be returned to Mexico and wait there for the duration of their immigration proceedings, with Mexico providing humanitarian protections for the duration of their stay.

Immigration 181

Immigration Court Legal Legal 181

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. Under that rule, he asked, states would never have standing to challenge immigration enforcement?

Immigration 105

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 105

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legal rules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of On it, Harpster has openly espoused misogynistic, transphobic, Islamophobic and anti-immigrant views. Prosecutors know it’s junk science too.

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 23, 2022

Share Can the Biden administration issue guidelines setting priorities in the enforcement of immigration law? In 2011, John Morton, then the director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, issued a series of memos setting enforcement priorities. Do states have standing to challenge these guidelines?

Immigration 92

Immigration Court Laws Statute 92

JURIST

AUGUST 21, 2021

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Thursday denied the Biden Administration a stay on a district court order reinstating a Trump-era policy requiring asylum-seekers to remain in Mexico while their immigration cases are pending. Texas and Missouri are challenging the MPP’s termination.

Immigration 104

Immigration Court Calendaring Government 104

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 3, 2022

Garland , involving whether federal immigration law bars a federal court of appeals from reviewing an immigrant’s claim that the Board of Immigration Appeals had engaged in impermissible factfinding because the immigrant had not filed a motion to reconsider. Missouri v. Santos-Zacharia v. Glacier Northwest v.

Court 132

Court Immigration Education Government 132

SCOTUSBlog

AUGUST 24, 2021

immigration court. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit holding that the policy was likely inconsistent with both federal immigration law and international law, but the justices dismissed the case earlier this summer after the Biden administration ended the policy. foreign policy.

Court 142

Court Immigration Government Construction 142

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

immigration court. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. In her cert petition, the U.S. Texas abortion law.

Laws 122

Laws Immigration Court Administrative Law 122

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 18, 2022

immigration court. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit holding that the policy was likely inconsistent with both federal immigration law and international law, but the justices dismissed the case in June 2021 after the Biden administration ended the policy. 29 decision to end the program has any legal effect.

Immigration 98

Immigration Court Litigation Litigating 98

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 22, 2023

support to Ukraine” as well as “irregular immigration.” Doughty are part of a 155-page opinion granting a temporary injunction, requested by Louisiana and Missouri, to prevent White House officials from meeting with tech companies about social media censorship. withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the nature of U.S.

Government 62

Government Immigration Laws Constitutional Law 62

The Crime Report

APRIL 25, 2022

The issue before the Supreme Court is whether the policy is discretionary and can be ended, as the Biden administration argues, or is the only way to comply with what Texas and Missouri say is a congressional command not to release the migrants in the United States.

Court 40

Court Lawyer Lawyers Legal 40

JURIST

AUGUST 25, 2021

The US Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Biden administration Tuesday night when it refused to grant a stay of a lower court order requiring the administration reinstate a Trump-era immigration policy. Texas and Missouri sued the government in federal district court, challenging the termination of the program.

Court 245

Court Immigration Government Legal 245

JURIST

JANUARY 11, 2024

The hearing was initiated by House Republicans who accused Mayorkas of failing to follow immigration law and of violating the public trust as border crossings have reached record levels. Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey claimed that the Mayorkas’s refusal to finish the border wall has woefully compounded the issue.

Misdemeanor 231

Misdemeanor Immigration Attorney Lawyer 231

SCOTUSBlog

AUGUST 20, 2021

immigration court. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit holding that the policy was likely inconsistent with both federal immigration law and international law, but the justices dismissed the case in June 2021 at the request of the Biden administration, which had ended the policy after taking office.

Immigration 103

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 103

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Ninth Circuit Affirmed Rejection of NEPA Challenges to Immigration Policies. The plaintiffs—identified as environmentalists, environmental groups, natural resource conservation groups, and cattle ranchers—alleged, among other things, that the immigration actions resulted in increased greenhouse gas emissions. Missouri v.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 30, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Thursday handed the Biden administration a major victory, giving it the green light to end one of the Trump administration’s signature immigration programs: the controversial “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while they wait for a hearing in U.S. immigration court.

Court 96

Court Immigration Government Statute 96

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MAY 7, 2021

Missouri and 12 other states filed a motion for a preliminary injunction in the federal district court for the Eastern District of Missouri seeking to block the Biden administration from using the social cost of greenhouse gases released in February 2021 by the Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases. Missouri v.

Court 40

Court Government Construction Litigation 40

JURIST

DECEMBER 14, 2021

The MPP, also known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy, requires asylum-seekers on the southern border to wait in Mexico, sometimes for years, while their asylum claims are processed in the US immigration system. Following the Biden administration’s decision to end MPP in early 2021, Texas and Missouri filed suit in federal court.

Court 197

Court Immigration Statute Government 197

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 25, 2022

immigration court. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit holding that the policy was likely inconsistent with both federal immigration law and international law, but the justices dismissed that case in June 2021 after the Biden administration ended the policy – or, at least, tried to end it. Arguments of Texas and Missouri.

Immigration 95

Immigration Court Government Laws 95

The Crime Report

AUGUST 16, 2021

The lawsuit resulting in Kacsmaryk’s decision had been brought forward by Texas and Missouri. Kacsmaryk, stated that Texas and Missouri were being harmed by the Biden administration’s decision to end the MPP, as migrants released into the U.S. schools.

Procedural Law 98

Procedural Law Laws Immigration 98

JURIST

JUNE 30, 2022

The MPP, originally announced in 2018 and implemented in 2019, allowed the US government to return undocumented immigrants to Mexico as they awaited their asylum hearings. Texas and Missouri sued claiming that the termination violated the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.

Immigration 187

Immigration Court Court Rules Government 187

The Crime Report

DECEMBER 30, 2021

President Biden campaigned against the policy, introduced by former President Donald Trump, and took steps to end it upon taking office, but Republican-led states including Texas and Missouri sued to force its continuation.

Immigration 104

Immigration Court Calendaring 104

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

Three Republican senators – Josh Hawley of Missouri, Mike Lee of Utah, and Ted Cruz of Texas – write that a precedent can be unworkable due to “a history of confusion in the lower courts, an unstable pattern of Supreme Court decisions, and a persistent lack of judicially manageable standards.”

Stare Decisis 133

Stare Decisis Court Laws Legal 133

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 15, 2021

In his 53-page opinion, Judge Kacsmaryk found that the states of Texas and Missouri had shown sufficient injury after noting increases in human trafficking and other criminal acts as part of the surge at the Southern border after President Joe Biden ended the policy.

Court 81

Court Immigration Court Rules Litigation 81

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in the battle over the Biden administration’s efforts to end one of the Trump administration’s signature immigration policies. The law, she told the justices, “didn’t create the kind of mandate that” Texas and Missouri “are now reading into the statute.”.

Immigration 97

Immigration Government Statute Laws 97