SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. Texas and Louisiana went to federal court in Texas to challenge the policy.

Immigration 106

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 106

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 3, 2022

Share Six days after hearing oral argument in the challenge to the Biden administration’s effort to unwind the “remain in Mexico” immigration policy, the Supreme Court on Monday called for more briefing. Prelogar offered to submit supplemental briefing on the question, and on Monday the court accepted that offer.

Immigration 119

Immigration Court Laws 119

JURIST

DECEMBER 2, 2021

The announcement follows an August US Supreme Court order requiring the MPP to restart over the Biden Administration’s objections. The Trump DHS argued that MPP was necessary to restore an orderly immigration process and reduce frivolous asylum claims. MPP is expected to restart on December 6.

Immigration 181

Immigration Court Legal Legal 181

Above The Law

OCTOBER 6, 2023

* Missouri asks Supreme Court to revive law banning local police from enforcing federal gun laws, which is. Publicly elected sheriffs shouldn't be deputized into enforcing federal immigration laws so why should they be enforcing federal gun laws? [ Law360 ] * Bigot brigade takes aim at the Naval Academy.

Immigration 91

Immigration Laws Legal Legal 91

The Crime Report

APRIL 26, 2022

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments today in the Biden administration’s appeal of lower-court rulings that required immigration officials to reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” policy that the administration “has twice determined is not in the interests of the United States,” reports the Associated Press.

Court Decisions 52

Court Decisions Immigration Court Court Rules 52

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2022

Share Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court justices may finally have to decide if the White House can write immigration rules (Joan Biskupic, CNN).

Immigration 82

Immigration Court 82

SCOTUSBlog

AUGUST 24, 2021

Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday night rejected the Biden administration’s plea for a reprieve from a district-court order requiring it to reinstate a Trump-era program known as the “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while they wait for a hearing in U.S. immigration court.

Court 143

Court Immigration Government Construction 143

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 30, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Thursday handed the Biden administration a major victory, giving it the green light to end one of the Trump administration’s signature immigration programs: the controversial “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while they wait for a hearing in U.S. immigration court.

Court 94

Court Immigration Government Statute 94

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in the battle over the Biden administration’s efforts to end one of the Trump administration’s signature immigration policies. During nearly two hours of oral argument in Biden v. It was, Prelogar stressed, an exercise of “his statutory discretion to make a policy judgment.”.

Immigration 96

Immigration Government Statute Laws 96

SCOTUSBlog

AUGUST 20, 2021

Share The Biden administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court for an immediate reprieve from having to reinstate a Trump-era program known as the “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico immigration court. The court agreed in October 2020 to review a ruling by the U.S.

Immigration 103

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 103

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 24, 2021

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The last scheduled conference of the Supreme Court’s term — which this term is being held Thursday — is usually one that yields many grants. A short explanation of relists is available here.

Administrative Law 65

Administrative Law Immigration Laws Government 65

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 18, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon agreed to decide whether the Biden administration must continue to enforce the Trump-era program known as the “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while they wait for a hearing in U.S. immigration court. After the U.S.

Immigration 97

Immigration Court Litigation Litigating 97

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 3, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Monday added nine new cases to its docket, including a high-profile dispute over the extent of technology companies’ immunity from lawsuits based on the content they host. However, the majority concluded, Congress – rather than the courts – should clarify how broadly Section 230 applies.

Court 133

Court Immigration Education Government 133

JURIST

MARCH 23, 2021

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in Cedar Point Nursery v. The states of Oklahoma, Arizona, Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Nebraska and Texas also filed a brief in support , citing “a longstanding commitment to protecting private property rights.”

Laws 118

Laws Court Legal Assistant Legal Assistance 118

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 31, 2022

The Supreme Court’s January sitting started off with the late addition of two cases challenging vaccine mandates imposed by the Biden Administration. The central issue before the Court in both cases is whether the vaccine mandates should be allowed to move forward while the legal challenges work their way through the lower courts.

Immigration 52

Immigration Statute Tort Healthcare 52

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

immigration court. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. Remain in Mexico” policy. As the case proceeded to an appeal in the U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman.

Laws 119

Laws Immigration Court Administrative Law 119

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 10, 2024

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. At last week’s conference, the Supreme Court had 472 petitions and applications before it – including three new relists, which yielded (so far) zero grants. Court of Appeals for the D.C. In Colindres, the U.S.

Court 100

Court Laws Government Immigration 100

The Crime Report

APRIL 25, 2022

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments this week on the legality of the Trump-era “Remain in Mexico” policy, officially called “Migrant Protection Protocols”, that has been a centerpiece of efforts to deter asylum-seekers, reports the Associated Press.

Court 40

Court Lawyer Lawyers Legal 40

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 29, 2023

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The Supreme Court announced that it would hold its “mop up” conference for October Term 2022 on Thursday, after completing the day’s opinion announcements. A short explanation of relists is available here.

Immigration 73

Immigration Court Government Laws 73

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 15, 2021

Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas delivered a blow to the Biden Administration on Friday by ordering the reinstatement of the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program, also known as the “Remain-in-Mexico” policy. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S.,

Court 76

Court Immigration Court Rules Litigation 76

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 22, 2023

support to Ukraine” as well as “irregular immigration.” Recently, a court found that the Biden Administration’s censorship efforts constituted “ the most massive attack against free speech in United States history. withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the nature of U.S. Those words by Chief U.S.

Government 57

Government Immigration Laws Constitutional Law 57

LegalTalkNetwork

FEBRUARY 5, 2019

We also learned more about the ABA’s actions in immigration, the government shutdown, and changes to their website. American Bar Association President Bob Carlson joins hosts Sharon Nelson and John Simek to discuss his tenure as president as well as ABA initiatives in the government shutdown, immigration, membership outreach, and much more.

Legal Research 40

Legal Research Immigration Legal Legal 40

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

Numerous groups attack the viability standard that the court adopted in Roe v. Many amici focus on the principle of stare decisis – and urge the court not to follow it in this case. They say Roe and Casey are not worthy of the deference that the court typically affords to its prior decisions. The viability framework.

Stare Decisis 134

Stare Decisis Court Laws Legal 134

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Supreme Court reversed an intermediate appellate court’s decision affirming a superior court determination that the defendant could not present a necessity defense.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MAY 7, 2021

Supreme Court seeking review of the D.C. The states argued that the Supreme Court’s stay of the Clean Power Plan while it was under review by the D.C. The states contended that further delay in the Court’s resolution of these “weighty issues” would have “serious and far-reaching costs.” FEATURED CASE. 20-1530 (U.S.

Court 40

Court Government Construction Litigation 40

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legal rules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98