Court Court Decisions Court Rules Immigration 
At the Lectern
APRIL 12, 2023
Three of the cases resulted in Supreme Court opinions. One of the three CLAY award Supreme Court decisions is Guardianship of Saul H. is also the only one of the three CLAY award Supreme Court cases to also be among the Daily Journal’s “ Top Verdicts of 2022.” 2022) 13 Cal.5th ” In Saul H. ,
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 2, 2021
Share Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court Rules on Tribal Police and Immigrants’ Testimony (Adam Liptak, The New York Times).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JULY 12, 2023
Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. According to the eight-member majority, “federal courts are generally not the proper forum for resolving claims that the Executive Branch should make more arrests or bring more prosecutions.”
The Crime Report
APRIL 26, 2022
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments today in the Biden administration’s appeal of lower-court rulings that required immigration officials to reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” policy that the administration “has twice determined is not in the interests of the United States,” reports the Associated Press.
The Crime Report
MAY 23, 2022
At the same time, Mexico’s Supreme Court ruled that Mexican immigration officers cannot stop and search suspected migrants, calling the practice racist, discriminatory, and unconstitutional, according to The Guardian. during COVID-19, reports the Associated Press. has deported more than 1.9 million migrants under Title 42.
Conflict of Laws
AUGUST 28, 2023
It is in this broader context that the decision of the Supreme Court of Namibia in Digashu v. Interestingly, the Supreme Court ruled as it did despite the fact that Namibian law does not recognise, and also criminalises same-sex relationships (see infra ). GRN, Seiler-Lilles v. 182 ), Richard F. 18 (2016/2017), pp.
The Crime Report
JANUARY 4, 2023
But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legal rules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
81 
Let's personalize your content