Court Rules Healthcare Legal Statute 
JURIST
DECEMBER 12, 2023
The Texas Supreme Court ruled on Monday against a pregnant woman who challenged the state’s abortion restrictions. A lower court had previously granted the woman, Kate Cox, permission to receive an abortion due to pregnancy complications, despite the state’s strict abortion ban. Her health is on the line.
JURIST
APRIL 16, 2021
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has upheld Ohio’s HB 214 law that prohibits doctors from performing an abortion with the knowledge that a women’s reason for terminating the pregnancy is a fetal Down syndrome diagnosis. The circuit split has increased the possibility of a Supreme Court review.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Day on Torts
APRIL 25, 2022
Because of that, the Court explained that the daughter did not have the authority to execute the arbitration agreement at issue here: Shorn of context, signing a stand-alone arbitration agreement is a legal decision. While the Agreement was ‘optional,’ it was bound up in the context of a healthcare decision[.] …The 3d 487 (Tenn.
Day on Torts
MARCH 11, 2022
When the brother was admitted, plaintiff filled out admission paperwork, including an arbitration agreement, as plaintiff had a durable power of attorney for healthcare executed by the brother and naming plaintiff as the attorney-in-fact. National Health Corp. , 3d 876 (Tenn. internal citation omitted). Code Ann. §
Day on Torts
APRIL 1, 2022
Bradley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center , No. The Court noted that this interpretation “comports with the purpose of the certificate of good faith—weeding out frivolous lawsuits.”. Applying this reasoning to the case at hand, the Court ruled that Exhibit 7 did not satisfy the certificate of good faith requirements.
MyCase
AUGUST 16, 2022
The article also states, “It is critically important to understand the labyrinth of potentially applicable ethics rules that intertwine with certain court rules on retirement.”. However, that age tends to be a little older in the legal profession. Mandatory retirement is a controversial topic in the legal industry.
Patently O
AUGUST 9, 2022
Accord Healthcare, Inc., The patentee in the case argues that inherency is too strict a standard and that it goes beyond what is required by the statute and prior precedent. Written description is a question of fact, and that the district court made a number of factual findings based upon evidence presented at the bench trial.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
211 
Let's personalize your content