SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 18, 2020

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that it was too early to resolve the legality of the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people who are in the country illegally from the state-by-state breakdown used to allocate seats in the House of Representatives. Second, the president must send a report to Congress by Jan. Throughout U.S.

Immigration 107

Immigration Court Government Legal 107

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

When agencies refused to turn over public records, ProPublica’s lawyers threatened litigation and in one case sued. The question, then, was how to get the method into trial without litigating the science behind it or teeing up an appeal. Ironically, he’s also singled out the government agency that launched his work.

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2021

Share The Supreme Court on Monday declined to immediately resolve an attempt by 14 states to revive litigation over a controversial Trump-era immigration rule after the Biden administration declined to defend it in court. This post was originally published at Howe on the Court.

Litigation 98

Litigation Litigating Immigration Government 98

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 11, 2023

During the Trump administration, the court called for the views of the solicitor general in Patterson v. and the government recommended that Hardison be reconsidered and overruled in that case. Groff sued USPS in federal court under Title VII for refusing to accommodate his religious beliefs and practices. Walgreen Co. ,

Government 86

Government Court Legal Legal 86

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 19, 2022

Share Nineteen states came to the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices to keep in place a Trump-era policy that allows immigration officials to quickly expel migrants seeking asylum at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. The dispute now before the Supreme Court is a separate case. In November, U.S.

Court 129

Court Immigration Government Litigation 129

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. It demands to be governed by as universal a rule of apportioning responsibility as is available.” and non-U.S.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Ninth Circuit Affirmed Rejection of NEPA Challenges to Immigration Policies. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

JURIST

JUNE 15, 2022

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a case in which Republican-led states were attempting to defend a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. In a brief order, the court dismissed Arizona v.

Immigration 104

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 104

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 10, 2020

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Divided Ninth Circuit Said Juliana Plaintiffs Lacked Standing to Press Constitutional Climate Claims Against Federal Government.

Court Reporting 40

Court Reporting Court Government Construction 40

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 26, 2022

Her mother hails from Jamaica, while her late father was the son of Jewish immigrants from eastern Europe. Kruger left WilmerHale for the University of Chicago Law School, where she taught a class in transnational litigation as a visiting assistant professor. Early life and career.

Court 113

Court Laws Lawyer Lawyers 113

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 21, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. The justices will hear the case in late November without waiting for a federal appeals court to weigh in.

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 145

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 15, 2021

Some 13,000 undocumented immigrants have been admitted to the country since the ending of the policy. Even though President Barack Obama did not satisfy APA conditions in imposing original rules, the Supreme Court enforced such procedures to reverse prior orders. ” That should sound familiar. Here is the opinion: Texas v.

Court 74

Court Immigration Court Rules Litigation 74

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 18, 2022

The argument comes less than a month after the justices heard oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of Republican-led states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy after the Biden administration opted not to do so. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.

Litigation 95

Litigation Litigating Attorney Court 95

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 3, 2022

Share The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that Kentucky’s attorney general should have been allowed to intervene to defend a state law restricting abortion after another state official declined to do so – even when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit had already struck down the law. The 8-1 decision in Cameron v.

Attorney 99

Attorney Legal Legal Laws 99

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 27, 2021

While most Administrations tend to minimize such test cases to avoid creating bad precedent, the Biden Administration has litigated with an utter abandon — elevating political over legal considerations in litigation. In the prior decision, the Court ruled 5-4 decision in Alabama Association of Realtors v.

Court 47

Court Legal Legal Court Rules 47

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 22, 2022

Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. immigration court. immigration court.

Immigration 98

Immigration Legal Legal Government 98

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v.

Immigration 94

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 94