Day on Torts
OCTOBER 31, 2022
After deposing Dr. Steege, defendants moved to exclude Dr. Steege on the basis that he was not competent to testify under Tenn. The trial court ruled that “Dr. Steege did not meet the locality rule outlined in Shipley v. In her initial expert disclosures, plaintiff identified Dr. Steege from Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
SCOTUSBlog
MARCH 3, 2022
Share The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that information about the federal government’s post-9/11 torture program at CIA “black sites” is protected by the “state secrets privilege,” a doctrine that allows the government to withhold information in litigation when disclosing it would compromise national security.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
NOVEMBER 27, 2022
The filing is particularly interesting because it focuses not as much on the BDSM or bondage bears being marketed by Balenciaga, but the inclusion the image of a child pornography court ruling. Hiding in plain sight a Supreme Court case involving a federal child porn law… Stop sexualizing kids to sell your ugly overpriced crap.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 23, 2023
Texas and Louisiana went to federal court in Texas to challenge the policy. District Judge Drew Tipton agreed that the policy violates federal law and vacated it nationwide. Moreover, Kavanaugh noted, the Constitution gives the executive branch broad discretion to enforce the laws.
JonathanTurley
JANUARY 19, 2022
On October 5, 2021, the site Above the Law ran a story by Senior editor Kathryn Rubino about what she described as a vehemently racist law student who was given a prestigious clerkship by William H. chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. This cannot be the end of this matter.”.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
NOVEMBER 7, 2017
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. The court determined, moreover, that even if the plaintiffs’ claims could be construed as post-effective date claims (i.e., and non-U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content