Constitutional Law Government Immigration Legal 
JURIST
FEBRUARY 19, 2024
The UN expressed concern Monday over the UK government’s action to make the Rwanda deal operational. ” He warned of the negative human rights implications, stating: The combined effects of this bill, attempting to shield Government action from standard legal scrutiny, directly undercut basic human rights principles. .”
JonathanTurley
JANUARY 6, 2024
It is essential that we spread the word on Kartasheva’s situation to put pressure on the government to make sure that she is not deported and to finish its review of the case to move forward with her citizenship. Indeed, unlike Trudeau, she knows the value of free speech and how easily it is lost to government agencies.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MARCH 10, 2022
The issues before the Court involved Native American law and immigration. United States : The case involves the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause and how it applies toa prosecution in the Court of Indian Offenses. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. The justices heard oral arguments in three cases.
JonathanTurley
MARCH 28, 2024
Many of us had predicted this result given the prior precedent of the Supreme Court on the federal preemption of state immigration laws. ” I also previously discussed how this interpretation would fail due to the text, intent, and history of the underlying constitutional provision. United States , 567 U.S.
Conflict of Laws
MARCH 30, 2023
1 of the Basic Law , the German Constitution) includes not only marriage as an institution but also discrete, existing marriages, and not only the married status itself but also the whole range of legal rules surrounding it and ensuing from it. So is the desire for legal certainty regarding the validity of specific marriages.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JANUARY 31, 2022
The central issue before the Court in both cases is whether the vaccine mandates should be allowed to move forward while the legal challenges work their way through the lower courts. Gonzalez : The latest immigration case before the justices involves when individuals subject to removal are entitled to an individualized bond hearing.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MAY 17, 2022
The justices heard arguments in six cases, which addressed issues ranging from methods of execution for death-row inmates to whether a high school football coach should be able to pray at midfield to the federal government’s controversial “remain in Mexico” immigration policy. Oklahoma v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
197 
Let's personalize your content