Remove companies viking-cruises-inc
article thumbnail

Rideshare companies ask justices to reexamine California worker-protection law

SCOTUSBlog

The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises v. This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether California courts are correct that the law, despite the decision in Viking River , nonetheless allows workers to keep disputes in court. In Uber Technologies, Inc.

Laws 96
article thumbnail

Supreme Court grants review in two civil cases

At the Lectern

The court also granted review in California Capital Insurance Company v. Uber Technologies, Inc. 1906, 1916] ( Viking River Cruises ); see Lab. 1906, 1916] ( Viking River Cruises ); see Lab. Prime Healthcare Management, Inc. Muir Medical Group IPA, Inc. ” Default. 2022) 83 Cal.App.5th

Court 49
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Several civil grant-and-holds at the Supreme Court’s conference

At the Lectern

Lyft, Inc. , Uber Technologies, Inc. Uber Technologies, Inc. 1906, 1916] ( Viking River Cruises ); see Lab. a)) maintains statutory standing to pursue ‘PAGA claims arising out of events involving other employees’ ( Viking River Cruises , at p. __ [142 S.Ct. Nor-Cal Venture Group, Inc.

Court 45
article thumbnail

Supreme Court will decide easement, sentencing cases

At the Lectern

Uber Technologies, Inc. , in which the court granted review last month and then limited the issue to: “Whether an aggrieved employee who has been compelled to arbitrate claims under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) that are ‘premised on Labor Code violations actually sustained by’ the aggrieved employee ( Viking River Cruises, Inc.

article thumbnail

Arbitration at Center of Last Week’s SCOTUS Oral Arguments

Constitutional Law Reporter

” In Circuit City Stores, Inc. Union Pacific Railroad Company: The case involves injury claims brought Union Pacific Railroad Company employee, Bradley LeDure, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) and Locomotive Inspection Act (LIA).The Viking River Cruises, Inc. Adams , 532 U.S.

article thumbnail

First Amendment questions and California arbitration battles

SCOTUSBlog

HRB Tax Group, Inc. The company says the FAA would be undermined if plaintiffs could include a public-injunction claim in every consumer case in which the parties agreed to arbitrate. In Viking River Cruises, Inc. Lewis , the cruise company asks for the justices’ review. Pivotal Software, Inc.

Felony 135
article thumbnail

Court sets quiet March argument calendar

SCOTUSBlog

Sundance, Inc. March 21): Whether an employee is required to show prejudice to prove that a company waived its right to require her to arbitrate her claims, especially when she would not have been required to make such a showing for another contract. Viking River Cruises v. Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C.,