Remove companies energy-transfer-lp
article thumbnail

Energy Transfer Unit Sues In Del. Over Secret Pipeline Deal

Law 360

A subsidiary of midstream energy company Energy Transfer LP has sued four of its former officers in Delaware's Chancery Court, alleging that just before Energy Transfer bought the unit in 2017, they struck a "secret, sweetheart deal" with PennEnergy Resources LLC to perpetually obligate the subsidiary to build high-pressure discharge pipelines for (..)

Court 52
article thumbnail

Another Case on Post-Production Costs

OilandGasLawyer

Netty Engler Energy, LP has asked the Texas Supreme Court to review the decision of the Fort Worth Court of Appeals in Netty Engler Energy, LP v. Texas Crude Energy, LLC, 573 S.W.3d Bluestone Natural Resources II, LLC, 2020 WL 3865269 (July 9, 2020). 3d 198 (Tex. In Burlington v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders return to the court after Collins

SCOTUSBlog

This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether the federal government’s decision to essentially nationalize the country’s largest federal backed mortgage-securities companies in the wake of the Great Recession was an unconstitutional “taking” of private shareholders’ assets. United States.

Court 127
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines to hear oil company petitions to move climate change cases to federal court

JURIST

The US Supreme Court Monday declined to hear five appeals from fossil fuel companies requesting to have their cases moved from state to federal courts. Each petition focuses on two federal statutes regarding the transfer of a case to federal court: 28 U.S.C. ” Local governments sued fossil fuel companies in Sunoco LP v.

Court 118
article thumbnail

October 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Charleston, SC filed suit against fossil fuel companies alleging their responsibility for “devastating” climate change impacts. In Baltimore’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Companies, Supreme Court Agreed to Consider Scope of Appellate Review of Remand Order. Source: Khanrak ). By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.

Court 72
article thumbnail

October 2019 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Fourth Circuit Declined to Stay Remand Order in Baltimore’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Companies; Companies Sought Stay from Supreme Court. On the same day, the companies filed an application for a stay in the U.S. On September 13, the companies filed an expedited motion for stay pending appeal in the First Circuit.

Court 40
article thumbnail

September 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Circuit Court of Appeals found that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) failed to adequately analyze the climate change and environmental justice impacts of two liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals on the Brownsville Shipping Channel in Texas and two pipelines that would carry LNG to one of the terminals. 20-1045 (D.C.