Remove companies chevron-corp
article thumbnail

US appeals court sends fossil fuel cases back to state court

JURIST

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Tuesday sent lawsuits by six California cities and counties accusing ExxonMobil, Chevron Corp and other energy giants of fueling climate change back to state court after the US Supreme Court required the court reexamine the cases. Other lawsuits are still pending.

Court 197
article thumbnail

Oil Giants Urge Toss Of Del. Court Climate Change Suit

Law 360

An attorney for Chevron Corp. told a Delaware judge Tuesday that state attorneys vastly overreached when they sued dozens of fossil fuel companies for alleged misrepresentations and conspiracies aimed at obscuring their purported role in climate changes now threatening the coastal state.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Poised to Decide Fate of Chevron Doctrine

Constitutional Law Reporter

The two most closely watched involve whether the Court should overrule its landmark decision in Chevron v. The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. The post SCOTUS Poised to Decide Fate of Chevron Doctrine appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Cockfighting in Puerto Rico and trade-dress protections for snack foods

SCOTUSBlog

Lotte International America Corp. the manufacturer of Pocky, sued Lotte International America Corp., a rival snack-food company, after Lotte began selling a similar chocolate-coated biscuit snack. Lotte International America Corp. Ezaki Glico Co. Pocky and its competitor, as depicted in the cert petition. Ezaki Glico Co.,

Sports 119
article thumbnail

Patent Law at the Supreme Court October 2021

Patently O

Chevron Oronite Company LLC , No. Lotte International America Corp. , Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V. , 21-202 ( NHK-Fintiv rule for denying petitions; appealability of IPR petition denial); Apple Inc. Optis Cellular Technology, LLC , No. 21-118 (mandamus review of IPR petition denial); Infineum USA L.P. Bongiorno v.

Court 79
article thumbnail

In a first for climate nuisance claims, a Hawai‘i State Court allowed Honolulu to proceed with its case against fossil fuel companies

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Starting in 2017, cities, counties, and states across the United States have filed claims (see here and here ) in state courts against fossil fuel companies seeking redress for the climate harms their products have caused. Chevron Corp. Many of these cases asserted nuisance and other tort law claims.

Court 80
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines to hear oil company petitions to move climate change cases to federal court

JURIST

The US Supreme Court Monday declined to hear five appeals from fossil fuel companies requesting to have their cases moved from state to federal courts. The fossil fuel companies argued that because greenhouse gases travel between states, rather than remain within state boundaries, their emission falls under the purview of federal law.

Court 118