Attorney Court Diligence Georgia 
The Fashion Law
AUGUST 6, 2021
Much like with the UK’s MSA, the law in Australia also currently lacks financial penalties for noncompliance, although Mills Oakley attorneys Luke Geary and Georgia Davis state that “under a similar law, which is yet to commence, there may be fines of up to $1.1 At the same time, court dockets in the U.S.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JANUARY 3, 2022
Supreme Court ended its December sitting with oral arguments in Carson v. 2246 (2020), the Supreme Court held that a state may not exclude families and schools from participating in a student-aid program because of a school’s religious status. The issue is now before the Court in Carson v. Constitution. In Espinoza v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 24, 2023
The image most of us had of former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis was a remarkably cheerful mugshot after her arrest in the RICO case brought by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. In the frenetic pace of attempting to raise challenges to the election in several states, including Georgia, I failed to do my due diligence.”
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
APRIL 9, 2021
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of New York City’s lawsuit seeking climate change damages from oil companies. The Second Circuit’s decision largely followed the reasoning of the district court’s 2018 decision. and Minnesota Federal Courts Remanded Climate Cases Against Fossil Fuel Industry.
The Crime Report
MAY 17, 2021
Thaddeus Johnson, an assistant professor of Criminology & Criminal Justice at the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University, believes it will. “We Would removing police from the frontlines of issues that do not directly impact public safety make a difference? The federal government’s role will also be crucial.
JonathanTurley
JULY 20, 2023
This would be the third criminal indictment of Trump and there may still be a fourth coming in Georgia. Supreme Court, which rebuked Smith for what it termed the “Government’s boundless interpretation.” That means finding a Trump supporter in the district’s jury pool is only slightly more likely than finding a snow leopard.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
144 
Let's personalize your content