2024 Court Rules Laws Statute 
Constitutional Law Reporter
FEBRUARY 28, 2024
Kirtz , 601 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a consumer may sue a federal agency under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681n and 1681o for failing to comply with the terms of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). As Justice Gorsuch explained, the Court has found a clear waiver of sovereign immunity in just two situations.
SCOTUSBlog
JULY 27, 2023
As the dispute came to the Supreme Court, it centered on legislation enacted earlier this year by Congress to expedite the pipeline’s completion. On June 3, President Joe Biden signed the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, a law passed to raise the federal debt ceiling. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
MAY 1, 2023
Natural Resources Defense Council , the Supreme Court ruled that courts should defer to a federal agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute as long as that interpretation is reasonable. On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to reconsider its ruling in Chevron. Share Nearly 40 years ago, in Chevron v.
Conflict of Laws
FEBRUARY 22, 2024
Introduction It is widely recognized that choice of court and choice of law agreements are powerful tools for structuring and planning international dispute resolution. Alex Mills, Party Autonomy in Private International Law (CUP, 2018) p. The parties also agreed that English law should be the governing law.
JURIST
MAY 19, 2023
Five TikTok users filed a lawsuit in a federal Montana court on Wednesday to stop the state’s newly enacted TikTok ban from going into effect. The five TikTok users argue that the newly enacted law “attempts to exercise powers over national security that Montana does not have and to ban speech Montana may not suppress.”
Patently O
MARCH 18, 2024
by Dennis Crouch In a recent nonprecedential decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court ruling ordering the correction of inventorship for U.S. ”) Patent law does not have a specific statute of limitations associated with claims to correct inventorship. Tube-Mac Indus., Campbell , No.
Conflict of Laws
APRIL 25, 2024
Service out under the ‘appropriate court’ ground Cheong Jun Yoong v Three Arrows Capital [1] involved service out of jurisdiction pursuant to the ‘appropriate court’ ground in Order 8 rule 1(1). It is perhaps the court’s analysis of gateway (i) which is of particular interest as it deals with a nascent area of law.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content