Remove 2022 Remove Cause of Action Remove Court Remove Tort
article thumbnail

No cause of action against employers for take-home COVID

At the Lectern

Victory Woodworks , the Supreme Court today holds that employers currently can’t be sued for failing to prevent the spread of COVID-19 to employees’ household members. Allowing liability “would impose an intolerable burden on employers and society in contravention of public policy,” the court says. In Kuciemba v.

article thumbnail

Reckless infliction of emotional distress plaintiffs was not within the reasonably foreseeable scope of the alleged tort.

Day on Torts

E2020-00688-COA-R10-CV, 2022 WL 1042733 (Tenn. April 7, 2022), plaintiff was the school secretary at an elementary school, and defendant was the employer of school bus drivers for that school. Defendant had filed a motion to dismiss, which the trial court denied, ruling that plaintiff had satisfied the elements of that claim.

Tort 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Tennessee HCLA Case Dismissed under Statute of Limitations.

Day on Torts

M2022-00476-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 16545403 (Tenn. 31, 2022), patient was hospitalized at defendant hospital from August 7-24, 2020. Plaintiff was thus not entitled to the 120-day time extension under the HCLA, and the trial court granted dismissal based on untimeliness. In Jackson v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center , No.

Statute 59
article thumbnail

Anti-enforcement injunction granted by the New Zealand court

Conflict of Laws

For litigants embroiled in cross-border litigation, the anti-suit injunction has become a staple in the conflict of laws arsenal of common law courts. This was the scenario facing the New Zealand High Court in the recent case of Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley Family Trustee Limited [2022] NZHC 2881.

Court 52
article thumbnail

The New Zealand Court of Appeal on the cross-border application of New Zealand consumer and fair trading legislation

Conflict of Laws

The New Zealand Court of Appeal has just released a judgment on the cross-border application of New Zealand consumer and fair trading legislation ( Body Corporate Number DPS 91535 v 3A Composites GmbH [2023] NZCA 647 ). In response, 3AC protested the New Zealand court’s jurisdiction.

article thumbnail

Wrong defendants in certificate of good faith caption should have resulted in dismissal.

Day on Torts

E2021-00881-COA-R9-CV, 2022 WL 1117453 (Tenn. April 14, 2022), plaintiff filed an HCLA claim against several defendants, including the State of Tennessee as the employer of Dr. Landry, who was allegedly negligent. The Court of Appeals began by looking at Tenn. State , No. On appeal, that ruling was reversed. Code Ann. §

Tort 59
article thumbnail

County not immune from suit where sheriff’s deputy failed to investigate death threats.

Day on Torts

M2020-01448-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 1210462 (Tenn. April 25, 2022), plaintiff was shot multiple times by her estranged husband in August 2018. The County filed a motion to dismiss based on the GTLA discretionary function exception and/or the public duty doctrine, which the trial court granted, but the Court of Appeals reversed.

Tort 59