Remove Drafting Remove Pennsylvania Remove Statute
article thumbnail

In a dispute over uncashed MoneyGram checks, Delaware faces the ire of 30 other states

SCOTUSBlog

Share The fate of hundreds of millions of dollars in unclaimed money may depend on the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the term “money order” in an arcane 1974 federal statute. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin , will be the second case argued on Monday, the opening day of the 2022-23 term. On one side is Delaware.

Statute 95
article thumbnail

Private rights of action, overtime pay, and the constitutionality of a billboard tax

SCOTUSBlog

Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. Goertz , involving the question of what statute of limitations state prisoners face when raising claims seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence.

Statute 81
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. The court concluded that the Freedom of Information Act’s deliberative process privilege shielded the redactions from disclosure.

Court 57
article thumbnail

New California Legislation Would Be a Major Step Forward for Climate Disclosure

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

23] The draft rule required them only if they are determined to be “material,” which has led to a considerable amount of confusion. [24] 51] That doctrine only applies to federal regulations, however, not to state statutes, so it does not pose a danger to the two California bills. 24] SB 253 does not require materiality.

Laws 98
article thumbnail

Jan. 6 defendant asks Supreme Court to throw out obstruction charge

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on April 16 in the case of a former police officer from Pennsylvania who entered the Capitol during the Jan. That conclusion, Fischer continues, is also backed by basic principles used by courts to interpret statutes. 6, 2021, attacks. The government appealed to the U.S.

Court 142
article thumbnail

The lives they lived and the court they shaped: Remembering those we lost in 2022

SCOTUSBlog

This spring, after POLITICO published a draft opinion of Dobbs and revealed that the court was poised to overturn Roe , Beckwith praised the leak. In 1988, Silberman held that an independent-counsel statute was unconstitutional — and though the Supreme Court did not agree with him in Morrison v.

Court 88
article thumbnail

January 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The records included spreadsheets tracking and analyzing comments, draft ANPRM fact sheets, meeting agendas, and emails and meeting invitations regarding CEQ’s process for managing comments. 1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. Southern Environmental Law Center v. Center for Environmental Quality , No.

Court 52