article thumbnail

Boohoo Group Says it Has Reached a Preliminary Settlement in Case Over “Fraudulent” Reference Pricing

The Fashion Law

The statutes that the plaintiffs rely on, including California Business and Professions Code section 17501 – the statute upon which their false advertising claims are based on – “unconstitutionally regulate free speech.” . The Defendants’ Answers. The Free Speech Argument. The cases are Farid Khan, et. Boohoo, et.

Statute 64
article thumbnail

Gang enhancements, union protections, racially biased prosecutions, the Second Amendment, Michael Jackson, and more at the Supreme Court’s conference

At the Lectern

The legislation amended the law regarding gang enhancements. The court wants a Court of Appeal opinion on the constitutionality of a state statute barring public employers from discouraging union membership. He argued that the statute criminalizing his conduct violates the Second Amendment. ” (Link added.) Michael Jackson.

article thumbnail

A double conference with no straight grants, but some significant denials

At the Lectern

The disputed issue concerns the RJA statement that “racism in any form or amount, at any stage of a criminal trial, is intolerable, inimical to a fair criminal justice system, is a miscarriage of justice under Article VI of the California Constitution, and violates the laws and Constitution of the State of California.”