Law 360
SEPTEMBER 26, 2023
Courts often subject parties using technology assisted review to greater scrutiny than parties conducting linear, manual document review, so parties using large language models for document review should expect even more attention, along with a corresponding need for quality control and validation, say attorneys at Sidley.
The Crime Report
MARCH 13, 2023
Orange County, North Carolina recently received a grant of $1.2 This grant will provide four social workers for police departments throughout the county and run until September 2025.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LawTechnologyToday
DECEMBER 9, 2022
Electronic filing in state and local courts is continuing to make slow progress as 84% of respondents reported that they now submit documents electronically to their respective institutions, compared with 83% in 2020 and 2018, and 79% in 2017. The post TechReport 2022: Litigation & TAR appeared first on Law Technology Today.
Paralegal Bootcamp
MAY 11, 2023
You can get some pushback from opposing counsel or even perhaps the court. Some firms, certainly smaller firms, don’t have the internal resources or the training resources or even the technology in-house, and so they’re relying on an outside vendor to do the e-discovery work. There are, of course, exceptions.
LawTechnologyToday
APRIL 13, 2022
Especially when it comes to technology, many lawyers are reluctant to put their confidence in workflows and solutions that seem to operate in a black box. Technology-assisted review is a prime example—although the use of predictive coding and other advanced analytics have been widely accepted in the U.S.
LegalReader
AUGUST 16, 2021
Now we'll see if that right stands up in court. According to Ojibwe law, manoomin, or wild rice, has the right to exist, flourish, regenerate, and evolve.
JURIST
SEPTEMBER 16, 2022
India’s Madurai Madra High Court Thursday held YouTuber Savukku Shankar guilty of criminal contempt and sentenced him to a six-month imprisonment in a suo moto petition against him for his remark on the Indian judiciary. The court said: The contemnor would be well within his rights to highlight specific instances of corruption.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content