Court Rules New York Personal Injury Statute 
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 13, 2024
Horn went to federal court in New York, arguing that the company that sold Dixie X, Medical Marijuana, Inc. The district court ruled for the company on Horn’s RICO claim. Horn , the maker of Dixie X asks the justices to grant review and reverse the 2nd Circuit’s ruling. On appeal, the U.S.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 29, 2024
The district court ruled for Medical Marijuana and the other companies on Horn’s RICO claim. The district court ruled for Medical Marijuana and the other companies on Horn’s RICO claim. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, which reinstated his RICO claim. Horn appealed to the U.S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 31, 2023
Below is an expanded version of my column in the New York Post on the return of Halloween and joy of little litigators in anticipation of the return of the festival of Samhain. The inability to secure a notary on a holiday has ruled out the waivers for the toddlers to sign, but I have avoided any stripper-trained, territorial monkeys.
JonathanTurley
AUGUST 25, 2021
The case is brought under statutes like 18 U.S.C. 2255, “Civil Remedy for Personal Injuries,” which provides that any person who is a victim of a violation of child pornography may recover the actual damages or liquidated damages in the amount of $150,000 per victim, and reasonable attorney’s fees. In New York Times v.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 8, 2021
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 30, 2023
Halloween of course remains a holiday seemingly designed for personal injury lawyers around the world and this year’s additions show why. ” __ Another case in the court is a cautionary tale about those creating their own haunted houses. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. Johnson & Johnson Perper v.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
AUGUST 4, 2021
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The court further found that EPCA’s legislative history did not support the plaintiff’s “expansive interpretation.” City of New York v. County of San Mateo v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
100 
Let's personalize your content