article thumbnail

Case preview: Justices to consider procedural issue in major climate-change lawsuit

SCOTUSBlog

The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a lawsuit brought by the city of Baltimore against companies that produce fossil fuels, seeking to hold them responsible for their role in global warming. Baltimore asked the district court to send the case back to state court, and the district court agreed.

Statute 135
article thumbnail

Digital Reporting: Back to the Future

The Record Xchange

In the case of court reporting, digital reporting is expanding from the courtroom into the deposition room. Since depositions represent as much as two-thirds of the total court reporting market, this is a significant moment in the adoption cycle. That simplified things a lot. The inflection point is upon us.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

The lives they lived and the court they shaped: Remembering those we lost in 2020

SCOTUSBlog

Cohen – who first met the Lovings when he was just 29 – filed a lawsuit on their behalf, challenging the Virginia law and similar state statutes as violating the 14th Amendment. He and his co-counsel, Philip Hirschkop, took the case to the Supreme Court. Virginia , the court did find the statute unconstitutional.

Court 121
article thumbnail

February 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Circuit also rejected two arguments by coal companies against the ACE Rule. First, the court found that EPA made and retained the requisite endangerment finding for regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. The magistrate judge concluded that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations. Mountain Coal Co. ,

article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) decision denying a petition to delist the golden-cheeked warbler was arbitrary and capricious because the FWS applied “an inappropriately heightened” standard to its review of the delisting petition. Richardson v. Clarno , No. 20CV01920 (Or.