Constitutional Law Reporter
MAY 21, 2024
Louis, Missouri , 601 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that an employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 must show that the transfer brought about some harm with respect to an identifiable term or condition of employment, but that harm need not be significant. City of St.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 22, 2022
(The Supreme Court held in 2005 in Deck v. Missouri that such shackling practices violate a defendant’s due process rights.) The answer to that question turned on the relationship between a Supreme Court decision and a congressional statute. In Brecht v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
NOVEMBER 4, 2022
Constitutional protections extend to litigation efforts by trade groups as well, though antitrust agencies are alert to litigation efforts that are designed to harass or coerce simply through the filing of the suit (and lobbying is also regulated by other federal laws). And in fact, a recent Sierra Club report analyzing U.S.
Patently O
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
Jordan is a third-year law student at the University of Missouri and a registered patent agent. Article III standing remains a hot topic at all levels of federal litigation and across many different areas of law. Guest Post by Jordan Duenckel. He has an extensive background in chemistry, food science, and viticulture.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 3, 2021
Three years before Davenport’s trial, the Supreme Court held in Deck v. Missouri that shackling a criminal defendant in front of the jury is inherently prejudicial and violates a defendant’s due process rights unless the state can demonstrate a “special need” to justify the shackling.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
SEPTEMBER 10, 2021
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The federal district court for the District of Montana is to consider these issues on remand. Missouri v. and non-U.S.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 27, 2022
In the Dobbs litigation of 2022, 26 states asked the court to overturn Roe and its successor, Casey. Missouri claimed to be the first to declare all abortion as unlawful except for medical emergencies. Thus, we remain deeply divided. South Dakota, Louisiana and Kentucky have immediate prohibitions that will come into effect.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content