Remove Court Decisions Remove Legal Remove Misdemeanor Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Federal appeals court upholds Indiana law mandating reporting of abortion complications

JURIST

Failure to comply with the law is a class B misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in prison and $1,000 in fines. The US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana agreed and issued a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the law. Writing for the majority, Circuit Judge Amy St.

Statute 288
article thumbnail

Court makes it easier for appellate courts to affirm federal felon-in-possession convictions after Rehaif

SCOTUSBlog

922(g) , the federal statute barring people with prior felony convictions from possessing firearms, the government must prove that the defendant knew he was a felon at the time he possessed a firearm. Common sense,” he continued, suggests that most people with felony convictions are aware of their legal status as convicted felons.

Court 92
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

March 2018 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision that vacated the listing of the Arctic ringed seal as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The court ordered the Board of Regents to produce all requested records within 90 days. C20134963 (Ariz.

Court 40
article thumbnail

June 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute.

Court 42
article thumbnail

August 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Ninth Circuit declined to remand with instructions for dismissal of the underlying action and also declined to vacate any district court decisions.

Court 40