Remove Contract Remove Contract Law Remove Court Remove Court Rules
article thumbnail

Panama Supreme Court rules 20-year concession for Canada copper mine unconstitutional

JURIST

Panama’s Supreme Court unanimously held Tuesday that the 20-year concession for the Canadian Cobre Panamá copper mine was unconstitutional. The law would have created a new 20-year contract for First Quantum’s Cobre Panamá mine. Canadian First Quantum acknowledged the judgement.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court says New Jersey can withdraw from Waterfront Commission

JURIST

The US Supreme Court Tuesday held that New Jersey may unilaterally withdraw from the Waterfront Commission Compact, an interstate compact between the two states created to fight crime in the Port of New York and New Jersey. New Jersey , a unanimous court found that interstate compacts are governed by the principles of contract law.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Federal appeals court rules Seneca Nation owes New York State years of casino revenue sharing payments

JURIST

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled Monday that the Seneca Nation is required to pay hundreds of millions of dollars of outstanding casino revenue sharing payments to New York State, following an appeal from arbitration that saw disagreement over the timeframes qualified for revenue sharing.

article thumbnail

Court rules against plaintiff seeking emotional distress damages for discrimination

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled 6-3 against a plaintiff seeking emotional distress damages for alleged violations of certain federal anti-discrimination laws. In Thursday’s ruling in Cummings v. Check back soon for in-depth analysis of the opinion.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court limits homeowners’ ability to sue their lenders in tort

At the Lectern

Balancing “the interests of homeowners in default against those seeking affordable home loans,” the Supreme Court in Sheen v. ” The court settles a conflict in Court of Appeal case law and notes a similar divide in federal district court rulings.

Tort 49
article thumbnail

Arguments Continue In Landmark Cryptocurrency Regulation Case SEC v. Ripple  

The Crime Report

Ripple Labs is whether or not XRP can be defined as a traditional “investment contract.” Supreme Court Precedent . The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the SEC, resulting in the “ Howey test,” still used today to determine whether a financial instrument can be considered an investment contract. Howey Co. .

Contract 115
article thumbnail

Justices mull availability of emotional distress damages in anti-discrimination cases

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday in , Cummings v. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held that Cummings could not seek damages for emotional distress. At the Supreme Court on Tuesday, the justices sought to pin down which methodology they should apply to such cases. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C. ,