Patently O

JULY 6, 2022

However, the district court concluded that the prior art was not enabling — i.e., a person of skilled in the art would not be able to construct (or even design) the claimed invention without undue experimentation. In the area of obviousness though, the doctrine was developed by courts and then implemented by statute in 1952.

Stare Decisis 73

Stare Decisis Statute Court Manufacturing 73

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 11, 2022

Both cases present the question whether statutes that authorize appellate courts to review final agency adjudications implicitly strip district courts of jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to those proceedings. The next two relists raise a related question: whether a habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. Federal Trade Commission.

Stare Decisis 79

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Statute Government 79

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 20, 2023

The facts Hetronic, based in Oklahoma, manufactures and sells radio remote controls that operate heavy-duty construction equipment. The court asks if there is a “clear, affirmative indication” from the face of the statute that Congress intended the law to apply extraterritorially. It owns U.S. Has Congress directly spoken here?

Stare Decisis 85

Stare Decisis Laws Statute Construction 85

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2022

The court will hold the other case raising that question, Ham v. Breckon , pending the outcome in Jones. This week we have only one new relist: Thomas v.

Stare Decisis 121

Stare Decisis Court Lawyer Lawyers 121