Constitutional Law Reporter
MARCH 10, 2022
Texas : The case involves gaming activities on Native American land in Texas. Texas , 36 F.3d 1994) (“Ysleta I”) granted Texas regulatory jurisdiction over non-prohibited gaming activities on the Tribes’ lands. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. 3d 1325 (5th Cir. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians , 480 U.S.
SCOTUSBlog
JULY 28, 2022
Dobbs is also the only example of a case where a complete draft of the majority opinion was leaked prior to the publication of the final draft. Politico’s release of an early draft of the opinion in Dobbs sent a whirlwind across the nation. The long lapse between Feb. Dobbs opinion vs. Dobbs leak.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
DECEMBER 12, 2021
Gavin Newsom thrilled many this weekend by saying that his administration will model a new law on Texas’ abortion ban that would let private citizens sue anyone who makes or sells assault weapons or ghost guns. First, the Texas law was quickly found to be unconstitutional, as would the California law.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 27, 2022
Here is what Thomas says about Texas, a state whose robust gun laws, he reluctantly concedes, undeniably support New York’s approach to public safety. But the Texas statute, and the rationales set forth in English and Duke , are outliers.” Justice Samuel Alito recognized this fact in McDonald v. June, 2022).
JonathanTurley
MAY 5, 2022
Below is my column in USA Today on the leaking of the draft opinion in Dobbs v. While denouncing what they see as the Court abandoning its principles, they are celebrating someone who violated every ethical and professional principle in leaking this draft opinion. The draft opinion, if left unchanged, would sweep away Roe v.
JonathanTurley
JULY 9, 2022
Below is my column in the Hill on the effort to declare an “invasion” along the Texas border to allow the state to take greater control along the border to stem the flow of illegal immigrants. This week, Texas Gov. The Biden Administration has already indicated that it will oppose such efforts. United States.
JonathanTurley
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
Justice Edwin Reade of the North Carolina Supreme Court later explained , “[t]he idea [was] that one who had taken an oath to support the Constitution and violated it, ought to be excluded from taking it again.” He is a Texas lawyer who has previously argued before the Court. Conversely, in my view, Jan.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content