article thumbnail

The art of justice: Re-examining landmark Supreme Court cases through expressionist paintings

SCOTUSBlog

Share Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting Constitutional Law: Xavier Cortada’s Images of Constitutional Rights , edited by Professors M.C. Cortada’s painting reminds us that Gideon’s petition started a constitutional debate that is still ongoing.

Court 119
article thumbnail

Justices will clarify how death-row prisoners can contest a state’s method of execution

SCOTUSBlog

In the past 20 years, the court has announced substantive constitutional law, pleading requirements, and timeliness rules that make it harder to win such arguments. 1983 , the iconic civil rights statute permitting plaintiffs (including prisoners) to sue state officers for infringing constitutional rights.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Federal Court Rules In Favor Of Journalist Contesting Georgia’s Anti-BDS Law

JonathanTurley

I have long maintained that the law is unconstitutional as a limitation of free speech and associational rights. This week, a court in Georgia became the latest to declare such laws unconstitutional. The opposition to these laws is not driven by the merits of the BDS movement or its opposition. ” O.C.G.A.

article thumbnail

Divided Supreme Court Limits Review of Factual Issues in Immigration Cases

Constitutional Law Reporter

1255 , which would have made Patel and his wife lawful permanent residents. The post Divided Supreme Court Limits Review of Factual Issues in Immigration Cases appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.

article thumbnail

So You Say You Want a Revolution? You Can Count Me Out

JonathanTurley

However, putting aside the basis for the decision, it helped stabilize our system. Jackson wrote in a 1953 Supreme Court decision , “We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final.”. Some early Americans declared they would simply defy what the court ruled after Marbury.