Patently O

APRIL 13, 2021

Samsung , Docket No. The Swedish company wants to litigate in the US, while the Korean company wants to litigate in China. Samsung Elecs. Chinese Case : Samsung Electronics Co., 2014 global cross-license of the SEPs between the two companies. by Dennis Crouch. Ericsson v. 21-1565 (Fed.

Litigation 104

Litigation Litigating Court 104

Patently O

FEBRUARY 1, 2021

Samsung Electronics Co., ” There is some history between Samsung and M&K’s family of companies, whose patents also originate in Korea. On appeal, the Federal Circuit vacated — holding that the PTAB “deviated impermissibly from the invalidity theory set forth in Samsung’s petition.”

Diligence 122

Diligence Drafting Technology Court 122

Patently O

JULY 1, 2021

In re Samsung Electronics Co., The underlying actions were filed by a patent holding company known as Ikorongo Texas LLC against Samsung and LG Electronics. The five also own a separate company known as Ikorongo Technology LLC. Ikorongo Texas then sued Samsung and LGE. Miller & Lux, Inc.

Statute 103

Statute Litigation Litigating Court 103

Patently O

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

Samsung Electronics Co., Ikorongo Texas then sued several companies, including Samsung & LG for patent infringement in WDTX. To be clear Samsung and LG have previously litigated in Texas, they have lawyers in the state and lawyers willing to go to the state. by Dennis Crouch. Ikorongo Texas LLC, et al.

Litigation 89

Litigation Litigating Technology Lawyer 89

Patently O

MARCH 15, 2022

Nippon Shinyaku Co. Do you remember Erie Railroad Co. Even in Kannuu Pty Ltd. Samsung Electronics Co. , Nippon Shinyaku Co., In that regard, the company has has requested the Federal Circuit issue an expedited mandate – ordering entry of the Preliminary Injunction to halt the IPRs.

Contract 78

Contract Court Laws Litigation 78

Patently O

FEBRUARY 24, 2022

The basics you know about res judicata (claim preclusion) and collateral estoppel (issue preclusion), but in patent law we have a third and apparent co-equal form of judge-made preclusion known as the Kessler Doctrine. Chemours Co. Samsung Electronics Co., 2022)(forthcoming). Ikorongo Texas LLC, v.

Laws 95

Laws Court Litigation Litigating 95

Patently O

DECEMBER 14, 2021

Mylan Laboratories Ltd. Beckton, Dickinson and Company , No. Kessler has been on a back-burner for decades, but in 2014 the Federal Circuit revived the case and found that it deserved to co-equal — a preclusion doctrine separate and distinct from issue or claim preclusion. Samsung Electronics Co.,

Laws 86

Laws Court Manufacturing Technology 86