article thumbnail

California sues Tesla for discrimination and harassment of Black workers

JURIST

In all, the suit includes causes of action relating to racial employment discrimination (harassment, assignment, discipline, promotion and termination) and retaliation, all under §12940 of the California Government Code. Several Black employees resigned out of a lack of faith in the fairness in internal investigations.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court will decide easement, sentencing cases

At the Lectern

An earlier published opinion in the case had reversed an award, including $2,500,000 in punitive damages, against an insurance company regarding the sale of the company’s annuity, because, the appellate court concluded, the person who sold the annuity was not the company’s agent. National Western Life Insurance Company.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Municipalities of Puerto Rico v. Exxon: a unique class action against fossil fuel companies presses for climate accountability in the United States

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Moreover, the case in Puerto Rico comes after recent litigation successes in Europe and elsewhere around the world, with courts holding governments and companies accountable for climate harms. Many of those cases include similar arguments that the companies knowingly marketed harmful products and misled the public about those harms.

article thumbnail

Australia High Court Delivers Major Blow to Free Speech In Defamation Ruling

JonathanTurley

compensatory damages and $300,000.00 punitive damages. 1997) where Chief Judge Wilkinson wrote for the Fourth Circuit: By its plain language, § 230 creates a federal immunity to any cause of action that would make service providers liable for information originating with a third-party user of the service.

Tort 34
article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Nissan announced that day that it would work with California and the federal government to establish “common-sense” national standards. The plaintiffs asserted a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and requested that the court award them compensatory and punitive damages. Union of Concerned Scientists v.

Court 55
article thumbnail

November 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Ninth Circuit also found that modification of the injunction due to EPA’s rulemaking action did not threaten separation of powers. The court wrote that ultimately it saw “a greater threat to the separation of powers by allowing courts to pick and choose what law governs the executive branch’s ongoing duties.” California v.