Constitutional Law Reporter

SEPTEMBER 27, 2021

Supreme Court recently declined to block enforcement of a Texas law that prohibits abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. The Texas law at issue, S.B. Unlike other abortion laws, S.B. A divided Supreme Court rejected the request for injunctive relief, thereby allowing the Texas abortion law to take effect.

Laws 52

Laws Court Cause of Action Constitutional Law 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

JUNE 1, 2023

Facts of the Case A Texas jury found petitioner Rodney Reed guilty of the 1996 murder of Stacey Stites. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Reed’s conviction and death sentence. In 2014, Reed filed a motion in Texas state court under Texas’s post-conviction DNA testing law.

Statute 52

Statute Litigation Litigating Cause of Action 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 8, 2024

The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. Natural Resources Defense Council , or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency.” 837 (1984).

Statute 52

Statute Cause of Action Entertainment Court 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

APRIL 20, 2022

USERRA’s cause of action against state employers may be pursued only in state courts, which a Texas court found to be unconstitutional because Congress lacks the power to authorize lawsuits against nonconsenting states pursuant to its War Powers. Please check back for updates.

Cause of Action 52

Cause of Action Court Constitutional Law Contract 52

JonathanTurley

JULY 23, 2021

The calls to boycott Ben & Jerry’s ice cream in states like Texas, Florida ,and Oklahoma will give citizens the common choice between something Half Baked and the American Dream. Indeed, some of these laws do not seem to support an actual boycott as opposed to a divestment in “listed companies.”

Cause of Action 50

Cause of Action Government Manufacturing Laws 50

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 23, 2020

The 41-page lawsuit, which seeks unspecified damages for emotional distress and violation of state law for distribution of intimate personal material without Hill’s consent, against defendants Salem Media Group Inc., Sullivan have long limited tort law where it would undermine the first amendment. Mail Media, Inc.,

Tort 42

Tort Cause of Action Court Constitutional Law 42