article thumbnail

Introducing the Trade Secret Case Management Judicial Guide

Patently O

Menell* who took on the pro bono task of assembling and managing a fabulous team of leading lawyers to create the Trade Secret Case Management Judicial Guide. The guide will quickly become leading the go-to source as Federal Judges manage their growing trade secrecy caseloads. – D.C.

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Approves of Order to Drop Patents from the Lawsuit to Facilitate Case Management

Patently O

Courts regularly limit the number of claims that may be asserted, but here the district court “acknowledges that it knows of no other court that has similarly found that it has the authority to limit the number of patents that a plaintiff may assert (as opposed to the number of claims) in the context of case management.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

8 Steps to Be the Rockstar Personal Injury Paralegal

Paralegal Bootcamp

The statute of limitations is a time limit on a particular cause of action. If the law firm accepted the case before the statute of limitations period expired, it could result in a finding of legal malpractice. Many firms have resources in-house to help the lawyers and support staff which can be particularly helpful.

article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

the court continued the case management conference scheduled for December 16 to June 9, 2021. the parties submitted a joint case management statement articulating their positions on how the case should proceed after the Ninth Circuit’s remand of the case (November 10). Chevron Corp. , 3:18-cv-07477 (N.D.

Court 55
article thumbnail

January 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The federal district court for the Northern District of California held a case management conference in City of Oakland v. The Court found that the case was not justiciable because it did not have a sufficient legal component to anchor the analysis. Minnesota v. American Petroleum Institute , No. 20-cv-1636 (D. BP p.l.c.

Court 52