SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 7, 2022

After a few slow weeks on the relist front, the Supreme Court came roaring back this week with four newly relisted petitions that, if granted, will likely be added to the March 2023 argument calendar. Helaman Hansen ran an immigration-advising service. Texas , 21-1601. Two years ago, in United States v. The only catch?

Immigration 89

Immigration Court Statute Law Firm 89

SCOTUSBlog

SEPTEMBER 20, 2021

But the spotlight on the case became even more intense earlier this month, when the Supreme Court turned down a request to block the enforcement of a Texas law that prohibits abortions after the sixth week of pregnancy. 1 argument date in the Mississippi case was part of the Supreme Court’s release of its December argument calendar.

Calendaring 131

Calendaring Immigration Court Education 131

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 17, 2023

Raimondo headline the calendar for the January argument session , which the court released on Friday morning. 8) – Whether the federal government provided adequate notice of an immigration proceeding, allowing the immigration court to enter a deportation order when the non-citizen does not appear. Texas (Jan. Fikre (Jan.

Immigration 117

Immigration Calendaring Government Manufacturing 117

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 17, 2021

Share In an argument calendar released on Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it will hear oral arguments in seven cases over five days. Texas (Feb. Texas (Feb. The post Climate change and immigration policies headline February argument calendar appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Calendaring 98

Calendaring Immigration Government Court 98

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 15, 2022

The court on Tuesday released the argument calendar for the term’s final session , in April. Texas , so that it could be argued during the April session (on April 26) and decided during the current term. immigration court. In February, the justices agreed to fast-track that case, Biden v.

Calendaring 100

Calendaring Contract Immigration Court 100

JURIST

AUGUST 21, 2021

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Thursday denied the Biden Administration a stay on a district court order reinstating a Trump-era policy requiring asylum-seekers to remain in Mexico while their immigration cases are pending. Texas and Missouri are challenging the MPP’s termination.

Immigration 104

Immigration Court Calendaring Government 104

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 22, 2021

Innovation Law Lab , the Supreme Court dismissed the challenge to the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy, which allowed the Department of Homeland Security to require non-Mexican immigrants seeking asylum at the southern border to stay in Mexico while they awaited U.S. The dismissal was not a surprise.

Sports 144

Sports Calendaring Government Immigration 144