JonathanTurley

JUNE 20, 2022

Officials then moved under “Red Flag” laws to seize four rifles and three handguns. Butte County District Attorney Mike Ramsey focused on his statement that “Chinese need to commit mass shootings against America for xenophobia and betrayal. Come on my Chinese folks, white graduating is open season for y’all.”.

Court Rules 34

Court Rules Laws Attorney Constitutional Law 34

JonathanTurley

APRIL 19, 2021

District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine then thrilled many by declaring that he was investigating Trump for a possible incitement charge. As I have previously written , these statements ignored both the elements of that crime and controlling case law. Trump’s Jan. 6 speech would not satisfy the test in Brandenburg v.

Criminal Law 60

Criminal Law Laws Law School Legal 60

JonathanTurley

JUNE 17, 2022

After the riot, District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine announced that he was considering arresting Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Indeed, such a claim would contradict controlling Supreme Court precedent. Tribe further predicted that Attorney General Merrick Garland would criminally charge Donald Trump. In Brandenburg v.

Mens Rea 40

Mens Rea Law School Laws Felony 40

JonathanTurley

MARCH 31, 2021

attorney Patrick Malone, who previously filed ethics complaints against lawyers representing the Trump campaign or the Republican party. That claim runs directly counter to the controlling case law. In rejecting a suit against the church on constitutional grounds, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: “Speech is powerful. .”

Punitive Damages 45

Punitive Damages Tort Statute Court 45

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 20, 2022

There were discussions of appointing Trump attorney Sidney Powell as a special counsel , seizing voting machines or replacing the Justice Department’s leadership. That speech appears protected by the First Amendment and existing Supreme Court precedent. At 4:17 p.m., In Brandenburg v.

Mens Rea 58

Mens Rea Felony Drafting Court Rules 58

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 18, 2023

Attorney General who announced his intention to pursue such charges. While I am a critic of Trump’s speech and actions on that day, I still believe that the the court is completely wrong on the First Amendment. While Judge Wallace reached the right result, I have major qualms with her analysis. That includes the D.C.

Court 53

Court Court Decisions Court Rules Legal 53

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 6, 2022

District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine announced that he was considering arresting Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Moreover, District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine announced that week that he was investigating Trump for a possible incitement charge. Attorney General to the current U.S. Rudy Giuliani and U.S.

Attorney 38

Attorney Legal Legal Court 38