Remove Alaska Remove Court Rules Remove Statute Remove Tort
article thumbnail

February 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

After Denying Motions to Stop Construction Activities in National Petroleum Reserve, Alaska Federal Court Enjoined Certain Work for Two Weeks. The court also concluded that the plaintiffs had established a likelihood of irreparable harm. Alaska Feb. Alaska Jan. Sovereign Iñupiat for a Living Arctic v.

article thumbnail

June 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute.

Court 42
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

November 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The court also dismissed defamation and related state tort claims. The court concluded that the forest products company had not pleaded actual malice with the level of specificity required to sustain the state law claims. The court granted the company leave to amend its complaint with 21 days. Alaska , No.

Court 40
article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

If the renewal license was an order, the First Circuit asked the state court to address whether the CCA expressly preempted the ordinance challenged in this case. government and the states of Alaska and Louisiana take steps to address displacement caused by climate change. City of Oakland v.