article thumbnail

When do legal observers at protests get First Amendment protection?

SCOTUSBlog

Louis, Missouri. A federal district court in Missouri ruled that Molina and Vogel’s claims could go to a jury, rejecting the officers’ argument that they were entitled to qualified immunity. United States 23-310 Issue : Whether the administrative law principles articulated in Kisor v. Ratzloff v.

Legal 89
article thumbnail

Immigration, takings, administrative law and the kitchen sink

SCOTUSBlog

The court also has a pair of new administrative law cases, both captioned American Hospital Association v. Louis, Missouri , 20-391. The post Immigration, takings, administrative law and the kitchen sink appeared first on SCOTUSblog. Becerra and with consecutive numbers. relisted after the Dec. 15 and Jan.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Vaccine Cases Step Out of the Shadows at High Court

SquirePattonBoggs

The challengers in the other case are a coalition of ten states led by Missouri. We say “almost” because the one (and only) time the full Court heard oral argument on an emergency stay application was way back in December 1970 in the classic administrative-law case of Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v.

Court 81
article thumbnail

The last grants of October Term 2022?

SCOTUSBlog

Louis, Missouri , 22-193 Issue : Whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination as to all “terms, conditions, or privileges of employment,” or whether its reach is limited to discriminatory employer conduct that courts determine causes materially significant disadvantages for employees. New Relists Muldrow v.

article thumbnail

Justices delve into a trio of thorny issues in states’ challenge to federal immigration policy

SCOTUSBlog

Texas , in which Texas and Missouri challenged the Biden administration’s decision to end the Trump administration’s controversial “remain in Mexico” policy. “I Circuit, strongly resisted Prelogar’s suggestion that lower courts had overlooked the text or history of federal administrative law.

article thumbnail

“Remain in Mexico” and Texas’ anti-abortion law

SCOTUSBlog

After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. In June 2021, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas of the Department of Homeland Security issued a decision terminating the policy.

Laws 121
article thumbnail

Biden administration seeks quick relief from restoring “remain in Mexico” policy

SCOTUSBlog

Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit holding that the policy was likely inconsistent with both federal immigration law and international law, but the justices dismissed the case in June 2021 at the request of the Biden administration, which had ended the policy after taking office.