Remove about history
article thumbnail

“The Georgia Fake Electors Scheme: What Does Legal and Political History Tell Us About These Charges?”

HowAppealing

“The Georgia Fake Electors Scheme: What Does Legal and Political History Tell Us About These Charges?” ” The post “The Georgia Fake Electors Scheme: What Does Legal and Political History Tell Us About These Charges?” ” John G. Malcolm has this post at the “FedSoc Blog.”

Legal 100
article thumbnail

“The Supreme Court and Race: A Sordid History is About to Repeat Itself.”

HowAppealing

“The Supreme Court and Race: A Sordid History is About to Repeat Itself.” ” The post “The Supreme Court and Race: A Sordid History is About to Repeat Itself.” ” Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law.” ” appeared first on How Appealing.

Court 100
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

“Clarence Thomas Went After My Work. His Criticisms Reveal a Disturbing Fact About Originalism. If judges are going to use history as their guide, they should probably try to get the history right.”

HowAppealing

His Criticisms Reveal a Disturbing Fact About Originalism. If judges are going to use history as their guide, they should probably try to get the history right.” His Criticisms Reveal a Disturbing Fact About Originalism. ” Law professor Gregory Ablavsky has this Jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

Laws 100
article thumbnail

“What One Black Judge’s Family History Can Teach Us About Justice: This is why representation matters.”

HowAppealing

“What One Black Judge’s Family History Can Teach Us About Justice: This is why representation matters.” The post “What One Black Judge’s Family History Can Teach Us About Justice: This is why representation matters.” ” Dahlia Lithwick has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

100
100
article thumbnail

“You Are Allowed to Have an Opinion About What the Constitution Means; The Supreme Court’s obsession with ‘history and tradition’ gives so-called experts influence they have not earned and do not deserve”

HowAppealing

“You Are Allowed to Have an Opinion About What the Constitution Means; The Supreme Court’s obsession with ‘history and tradition’ gives so-called experts influence they have not earned and do not deserve”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes.

100
100
article thumbnail

“The Four Internet Analogies of the Apocalypse: How the Supreme Court in the Netchoice oral arguments got snagged on the most basic problem in the history of the Internet, and what that reveals about how they should rule.”

HowAppealing

“The Four Internet Analogies of the Apocalypse: How the Supreme Court in the Netchoice oral arguments got snagged on the most basic problem in the history of the Internet, and what that reveals about how they should rule.” ” Kate Klonick has this post at her Substack site, “The Klonickles.”

Court 100
article thumbnail

Don’t (Want To) Know Much About History

LegalReader

Remembering and caring about history are not the same as believing in the idealized mythology that passes for American history.

105
105