Remove 2030 Remove Legal Remove Statute Remove Technology Assisted Review
article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Second Circuit agreed with the district court that the plaintiff lacked standing because he failed to allege an injury in fact since he “never explained why he had any legal right to have the document distributed.” EPA’s brief is due December 15. National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project v. Williams , No.

Court 55
article thumbnail

January 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Friends of the Headwaters v. 4:20-cv-00115 (D.

Court 52
article thumbnail

November 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The mining company argued that the district court should not have issued the injunction without hearing legal arguments and factual evidence on the appropriate remedy, and without weighing the mandatory factors for a mandatory injunction. Energy & Environment Legal Institute v. Resolute Forest Products, Inc. 3:17 -cv-02824 (N.D.

Court 40