ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 18, 2022

On June 15, 2022, the Prague Municipal Court, a first instance administrative court, decided in favor of the plaintiffs in the first Czech strategic climate case ( Klimatická žaloba ?R The court rejected the plaintiffs’ claim related to the failure to implement sufficient adaptation measures. On standing. On adaptation measures.

Litigation 40

Litigation Litigating Government Court 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 23, 2021

The Hague District Court ordered Shell in Milieudefensie et al. Royal Dutch Shell plc to reduce its emissions by 45% by 2030, relative to 2019, across all activities, including its subsidiaries and both its own emissions and end-use emissions (Scope 1, 2 and 3). The government has full discretion in how to comply with the measures.

Litigation 78

Litigation Litigating Government Court 78

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

APRIL 9, 2024

The court ruled the complaint brought by the four individual women inadmissible due to the lack of victim status and maintained its strict requirements under Article 34 of the Convention. While the domestic case ( Commune de Grande-Synthe v.

Litigation 137

Litigation Litigating Court Government 137

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 22, 2022

In June 2022, the Prague Municipal Court ruled in Klimatická žaloba ČR v. the Netherlands (Ministry of Climate and Energy) , the District Court of the Hague held that energy companies RWE and Uniper could not claim financial compensation from the government for the mandatory phase-out of coal-fired electricity production.

Litigation 127

Litigation Litigating Government Court 127

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JUNE 1, 2022

In its Nationally Determined Contribution , Japan has committed to reducing GHG emissions by 46% in 2030 from 2013 levels and achieving net zero emissions by 2050. The Osaka District Court and the Osaka High Court ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the claims related to GHG emissions.

Litigation 143

Litigation Litigating Construction Tort 143

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

APRIL 8, 2022

In 2021, the German Federal Constitutional Court ruled in favor of the petitioners and struck down parts of Germany’s climate law as incompatible with fundamental rights for failing to set sufficient provisions for emissions cuts beyond 2030. In Neubauer, et al.

Litigation 96

Litigation Litigating Government Legal 96

Conflict of Laws

MAY 26, 2021

In the introduction we mentioned the English Supreme Court ruling in Okpaby v Shell [2021] UKSC 3 of February 2021. Increasingly, it seems, victims of environmental damage and foundations fighting for environmental protection can celebrate victories. To be continued – undoubtedly.

Litigation 52

Litigation Litigating Laws Court 52

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

The appellate court also found that even if the trial court erred, the error was harmless because the State proved both acts beyond a reasonable doubt. Hawaii Court Ruled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review. The Court also accepted interventions by NGOs and other interested cities.

Court 55

Court Government Litigation Litigating 55

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 12, 2023

The program is intended to ensure compliance with the annual emission targets for the building and transportation sectors for the years 2024 to 2030. Unlike in the 2021 landmark ruling in Neubauer et al. On the merits as well, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are not alone in this assessment.

Litigation 142

Litigation Litigating Government Court 142

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JUNE 8, 2021

The court denied, however, Connecticut’s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district court rulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Baltimore case.

Court 42

Court Statute Government Litigation 42

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

Under the Endangered Species Act, the court vacated the FWS’s biological opinion because the incidental take statement lacked “the requisite specificity of mitigation measures for the polar bear” and because the take finding for the polar bear was arbitrary and capricious. On August 31, BOEM issued a record of decision for Lease Sale 257.

Litigation 40

Litigation Litigating Court Laws 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. Spain approved the National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 in March 2021. temperature target.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

NOVEMBER 7, 2017

As Compliance Date for Methane Waste Rule Nears, California Federal Court Ruled That BLM Could Not Postpone Compliance, Oil and Gas Trade Groups Again Asked Wyoming Federal Court for Preliminary Injunction. On October 4 , the federal district court for the Northern District of California vacated the U.S.

Court 40

Court Attorney Technology Assisted Review Legal 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 10, 2020

The court said the petitioner’s comments on the draft and final EIRs concerning the analysis of greenhouse gas emissions were not sufficient to exhaust administrative remedies. Swiss Court Ruled that Imminent Danger of Climate Crisis Justified Protesters’ Actions.

Court Reporting 40

Court Reporting Court Government Construction 40

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 27, 2022

Environmental Protection Agency began with the Obama administration’s adoption of the Clean Power Plan, a 2015 rule that sought to combat climate change by reducing carbon pollution from power plants. Moreover, they add, in its 2011 decision in American Electric Power v.

Court 100

Court Court Rules Government Drafting 100