Remove 2030 Remove Cause of Action Remove Drafting Remove Legal
article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Second Circuit agreed with the district court that the plaintiff lacked standing because he failed to allege an injury in fact since he “never explained why he had any legal right to have the document distributed.” EPA’s brief is due December 15. National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project v. Williams , No.

Court 55
article thumbnail

January 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The records included spreadsheets tracking and analyzing comments, draft ANPRM fact sheets, meeting agendas, and emails and meeting invitations regarding CEQ’s process for managing comments. The Court found that the case was not justiciable because it did not have a sufficient legal component to anchor the analysis. 3:18-cv-00113 (W.D.

Court 52
article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The District of Utah held that the lease suspensions merely maintained the status quo and therefore were not major federal actions subject to NEPA; the conservation groups therefore lacked standing. Among the inadequacies found by the court was Ecology’s failure to consider climate change in drafting the permits. Living Rivers v.

Court 45