ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

They asserted five causes of action: a claim under NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act; breaches of the 1851 Fort Laramie Treaty, the 1855 Lame Bull Treaty, the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty; and a failure to adhere to the Department of the Interior’s tribal consultation policies.

Court 54

Court Government Litigation Litigating 54

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JANUARY 13, 2021

The records included spreadsheets tracking and analyzing comments, draft ANPRM fact sheets, meeting agendas, and emails and meeting invitations regarding CEQ’s process for managing comments. NGOs Filed Suit Alleging the Government of Spain Unlawfully Failed to Set 2030 Climate Targets. Southern Environmental Law Center v. Greenpeace v.

Court 52

Court Government Technology Assisted Review Litigation 52

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The District of Utah held that the lease suspensions merely maintained the status quo and therefore were not major federal actions subject to NEPA; the conservation groups therefore lacked standing. Among the inadequacies found by the court was Ecology’s failure to consider climate change in drafting the permits. Living Rivers v.

Court 44

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 44