Remove firms allen-matkins
article thumbnail

Allen Matkins Says Ex-Atty's Role Shouldn't DQ Firm

Law 360

Allen Matkins has reiterated that a California federal court should not disqualify the firm from representing a pair of landowners in a suit from Union Pacific, arguing that a former attorney's role with the firm doesn't warrant disqualification and that there's no evidence confidential information was ever disclosed, as the freight operator contended (..)

article thumbnail

Union Pacific Says Atty's Status Requires Allen Matkins DQ

Law 360

Freight rail operator Union Pacific urged a California federal judge to disqualify Allen Matkins attorneys representing the defendants in its environmental contamination lawsuit, arguing that a conflicted lawyer who purportedly retired has in fact remained at Allen Matkins so the firm must be taken off the case.

Lawyer 40
article thumbnail

United States: Real Estate Partnerships And Section 1031 Exchanges - Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Mondaq

Jared Kassan, a partner at law firm Allen Matkins, participated on a panel earlier this year to discuss legal issues surrounding partnerships and 1031 exchanges.