This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.

Remove Drafting Remove Legal Remove Technology Assisted Review Related Topics
Cause of Action Case Management Punitive Damages Court Decisions Statute Litigating Litigation Court Rules Legal Court More Related Topics >
article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

The Second Circuit agreed with the district court that the plaintiff lacked standing because he failed to allege an injury in fact since he “never explained why he had any legal right to have the document distributed.” EPA’s brief is due December 15. National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project v. Williams , No.

Court 54
Court Government Litigation Litigating 54
article thumbnail

January 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JANUARY 13, 2021

The records included spreadsheets tracking and analyzing comments, draft ANPRM fact sheets, meeting agendas, and emails and meeting invitations regarding CEQ’s process for managing comments. The court concluded that CEQ had not demonstrated it would suffer “a reasonably foreseeable harm” from unredacted production. 3:18-cv-00113 (W.D.

Court 52
Court Government Technology Assisted Review Litigation 52
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

 

Stay Connected

Join 105,000+ Insiders by signing up for our newsletter

About
Awards
About
Editions
Awards
Editions
Topics
LinkedIn Twitter
Powered by Aggregage | Terms and Conditions | Your California Rights and Privacy Policy
© Aggregage 2024