JonathanTurley
MAY 14, 2022
After denouncing the recent leak of the draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade as “an infidelity,” Thomas dismissed the reliance on the principle of stare decisis , or the respect for precedent. The comment quickly lit up the lines of law professors, including my own mailbox. And I just keep going.”.
LawSites
JUNE 2, 2022
The surreptitiously leaked draft of Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion overturning Roe v. But, legal tech nerd that I am, I wondered how the draft would fare if I subjected it to the scrutiny of the legal editing software BriefCatch , which recently rolled out a new-and-improved version 3 of its product.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 24, 2022
The decision followed the leak in early May of a draft opinion showing that a majority of the justices were privately poised to take that step. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , a challenge to a 2018 Mississippi law that bans virtually all abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy. Casey , which re-affirmed that right in 1992.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 27, 2022
I suspect one of the justices wrote a draft separate opinion that was sufficiently persuasive to shake loose the necessary votes for a grant. There are three new relists, and two new kinda-sorta relists. Gorgi Talevski was a resident of Valparaiso Care and Rehabilitation, a state-run nursing facility near his family home in Indiana.
JURIST
MARCH 22, 2022
In the final step, she looks into the written law. She uses the interpretation and application of law from the written text and observes the limits of her authority. Jackson specified that she does not interpret the law from her own understanding but tries to interpret it according to its intended purpose.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 16, 2024
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving the deference that courts should give to federal agencies’ interpretations of the laws that they administer. From health care to finance to environmental pollutants, administrative agencies use highly trained experts to interpret and carry out federal laws.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 17, 2022
Breyer framed the question as whether the law violated the “Federal Constitution as interpreted in Planned Parenthood v. First, the law made no “exception for the preservation of the … health of the mother.” Second, Breyer explained that the law imposed “‘an undue burden on a woman’s ability’ to choose” abortion.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
46 
Let's personalize your content