article thumbnail

This week’s relists: preemption of consumer protection laws, bankruptcy claims, COVID mandates and. Chevron deference again?

SCOTUSBlog

Yes, the statute really does have a full cite to the opinion in it. To ensure timely payment of property taxes and insurance premiums, many mortgage lenders require borrowers to deposit money into escrow accounts, which often carry a significant positive balance. Nelson ,…517 U.S. The California state law at issue in Flagstar Bank v.

Laws 84
article thumbnail

Spooky Torts: The 2022 List of Litigation Horrors

JonathanTurley

See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. However, at his deposition, the defendant’s son denied throwing the egg which allegedly struck the plaintiff’s daughter. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations. If they are found 51 percent at fault, they are barred entirely from recovery.

Tort 36
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Spooky Torts: The 2021 List of Litigation Horrors

JonathanTurley

See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. However, at his deposition, the defendant’s son denied throwing the egg which allegedly struck the plaintiff’s daughter. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations. If they are found 51 percent at fault, they are barred entirely from recovery.

Tort 36
article thumbnail

Spooky Torts: The 2023 List of Litigation Horrors

JonathanTurley

See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. However, at his deposition, the defendant’s son denied throwing the egg which allegedly struck the plaintiff’s daughter. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations. If they are found 51 percent at fault, they are barred entirely from recovery.

Tort 45
article thumbnail

May 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. First, the Supreme Court concluded that the statute requiring Commission approval of affiliated-interest agreement did not require environmental review. Maui and Honolulu oppose the extension request. County of Maui v.

Court 40