Conflict of Laws

DECEMBER 12, 2020

From the perspective of private international law, the following two issues, among others, are particularly worth of concern: (1) Jurisdiction: The Court exercised the jurisdiction over the dispute because the Dutch defendants did not raise an objection to its jurisdiction who responded to the action timely. [7].

Laws 98

Laws Court Contract Legal 98

Conflict of Laws

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

Article 6, on the other hand, says that a foreign state shall not be deemed to have consented to jurisdiction by appearing in Chinese court to assert immunity, by having its representatives testify, or by choosing Chinese law to govern a particular matter. as well as “PRC laws” and “international agreements.” Convention.

Drafting 48

Drafting Court Laws Government 48

Conflict of Laws

AUGUST 3, 2023

While application of the CSDDD to these companies before Member State courts is guaranteed due to its mandatory character, jurisdiction over non-EU defendants within the EU is not. If the relevant national rules do not establish jurisdiction, no access to court is given within the EU. 6 (1) Brussels I Regulation Recast.

Drafting 52

Drafting Diligence Procedural Law Court 52

Conflict of Laws

MAY 26, 2021

Both the first instance court and the court in appeal found that the claims were sufficiently connected, despite the contentions of Shell. in the 2015 ruling). Applicable law is defined based on the Dutch conflict of laws rules on torts, namely art. Procedural matters. 7(1) DCCP’ (at [3.1]

Litigation 52

Litigation Litigating Laws Court 52

Conflict of Laws

MARCH 19, 2021

The following analysis undertakes the attempt to clarify the key aspects from the perspective of German international private law. Eichel: Choice of Court Agreements and Rules of Interpretation in the Context of Tort or Anti-trust Claims. 1 Lugano Convention 2007 vis-à-vis claims in tort.

Divorce 52

Divorce Contract Tort Court 52