Remove Court Rules Remove Depositions Remove Litigating Remove Manufacturing
article thumbnail

Spooky Torts: The 2023 List of Litigation Horrors

JonathanTurley

The court ruled against her and found that the park’s duty was only to “make conditions as safe as they appear to be” and that Munoz “ was aware of the risk she encountered, and expected to be surprised, startled, and scared.” particularly those with ravenous monkeys. Ferlito) and her little lamb (Mr.

Tort 43
article thumbnail

Tennessee Court of Appeals: HCLA plaintiff should have been allowed to substitute expert.

Day on Torts

During Dr. Allen’s deposition, he testified that the decedent would “probably be alive” if he had sought treatment earlier, and defendant doctor thereafter filed a motion to amend his answer to plead the comparative fault of decedent. Plaintiff identified Dr. Sobel as his standard of care expert and Dr. Allen as his causation expert.

Court 105
article thumbnail

Guest Post by Alan Cox: The Damages Testimony in VLSI Technologies v. Intel

Patently O

Regression analysis is a sophisticated quantitative technique that is widely used in the academic literature, in making business decisions and in many areas of litigation, though it is seldom presented in patent trials. A ruling in Intel’s favor may have made future royalties unavailable. 0.764 X 1.11% X $Accused Product Sales.