SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 23, 2023
Bartenwerfer also relied on neighboring provisions of Section 523(a)(2), in which it is clear that the debtor’s own malfeasance is required for any limitation of the discharge. Barrett’s last major point discusses an 1885 Supreme Court decision ( Strang v.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 3, 2022
It would be “bizarre,” she contends, for the liability under subparagraph (A) to leave a debtor unable to discharge a debt incurred through the fraud of another when the parallel provision for fraudulent financial statements clearly is limited to the debtor’s own malfeasance.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 23, 2023
In its petition, Great Lakes claims that choice of law under federal admiralty has been utter chaos since a 1955 Supreme Court decision , made tolerable only by strict enforcement of choice-of-law clauses. It argues that the 3rd Circuit’s decision has thrown all of that into upheaval and must be reviewed.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content